IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv6 mostly for DS-Lite

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 20 March 2024 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B227C14F6B8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B39YD5S4dACN for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAA98C14F616 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-53fbf2c42bfso144018a12.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710963296; x=1711568096; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2J1a7ElH6KHn/P/gX0P9nmjRWOEhxKhgQzCNEL4om1U=; b=IIdDhzT8qurpZXLU6kBzTZdozq+5JfLOsc5f7EckiWlqmvDIeLbl5rP+yONJowosG5 gnFFAA4CmcIZQ0o1pgbtIBX6mv2TfBFbpJqm3QKpAZ2FfjQmk13zEzMFJgD9/zq4VJ/U tiCi//jHvTupgjwQKtBYoBmfi8pb/13EYf9mWEDYlQ0G+bM/2vEyPzOb1ifTGf5EAaRs vsDuRpRCX9Y66pt4ekta4/tJqfkSgwyD1TPw3EU88tSPnI474z5nJengqlItpCVivf1p 5NUrSQH8BmPxTk7/sCE7mzK4hGCgHKF0b6Za7mkugLDU/iac2ByLZTSs25QeZ7n/lzq5 0cuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710963296; x=1711568096; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2J1a7ElH6KHn/P/gX0P9nmjRWOEhxKhgQzCNEL4om1U=; b=Fh6jTYP3E/UBo0ePxhiJyeGcfrRpufrpMNyNeU+8wcZSHQNWXBZvkqhrJ2Hza7Zvcl isUJ4YTya/vdEUZlvHUNpRne4M993optYGREHkWS+DNR/1Sj2qJXc8KLJ0czo21nVxrd zmB1iky3yXfoX81EPKWQZ3t+0wTe+IW7fnGeDkmi3Q+PUN6IqT4+V6Xi82SdI2D6R1YG Zwn5aTQGYw7yRqlSvXm0Z0S5w910DKoC7h5juMSNVR7bnjtiPkzNZ8p0OZgir5zgPJY0 WQib+LctbTtFUPVrPoWOqPH6llYLczmbzpOwfJ5kcx/OgT+dQan18nMwDVha7L91MI7C siMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxKO2b9JZCZAici8ahOwqXj4dZoztMTS1sKUmocPqrhN3aQOxNK Z5rQxsRTkswPF+iabgShKEkwO9Hxs6obeBb2Lm/6elqfpJ1xJFYl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFac+goyMyjtF8RY0JfbekmwCGo8ZcWzmk/bjPiLLXXQpvadgfUlaz1VWHeyj0HY3t6I+F2mA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:4d9a:b0:1a3:6820:d33 with SMTP id gj26-20020a056a204d9a00b001a368200d33mr7624871pzb.38.1710963295837; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2404:4400:541d:a600:44b7:2c2e:2bc6:8707? ([2404:4400:541d:a600:44b7:2c2e:2bc6:8707]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z3-20020aa79e43000000b006e6fd17069fsm9547651pfq.37.2024.03.20.12.34.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6de22cfd-b845-bd65-5b79-bc05f1eee1e8@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:34:51 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <Zfqag8pqi3in3G5p@Space.Net> <2AA6E4EF-01CA-4CE5-AF73-9BCA4B0586B0@isc.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2AA6E4EF-01CA-4CE5-AF73-9BCA4B0586B0@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ZSZJifaG-UEWVrMbFpxDDNDfL5A>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 mostly for DS-Lite
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 19:34:57 -0000

On 20-Mar-24 23:04, Mark Andrews wrote:
> So ISPs have to back out DS-lite and deploy NAT64 just so people can deploy IPv6 mostly. We have provided a number of IPV4AAS mechanisms which all work at the node level as well as CPE level.  It should be possible to support any of them.

Is anybody saying that IPv6-mostly is mandatory? I don't see why an ISP that currently runs DS-lite is forced to rip it out. DHCP 108 won't work, that's all.

     Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email