Re: [v6ops] IPv6 mostly for DS-Lite

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Thu, 21 March 2024 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1573C151520 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.806
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.806 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MyHAntCc9eKo for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4274AC14F6F5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1711060307; x=1742596307; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=UfTZMzcL9c3Cq96Bzx4Zlg7QXzN6W4qT1iTUMDDLiSo=; b=gLYJDKMbrOsNEQhxzLEdm7q977Q1FqAJ8HXvodifclCd/sULE/I7iaIS YWvbZ2EfVMgcZ+kIv/ck2dmBaunaLzZiithma9QghhSQenX46YgN8dF29 OV2T3nTUtM/FcxC7RZ5lp/kWqZtl/i7OuSqXgdTXBLn6iVkNSaNMy/RgJ Uvq1gVMAV6y3EF12r+qPPv9zwC7IpymeKtgTMg4vUfBctVYs90+f2O4ba rlrhewxyl+MAxGIIStHTomMSYWaPI8c5SMUsEB7xKpISGdAk+7Wp4D5L7 cwW/nEX00BwTsMMUqHPif7ryFoZT2Gx8iAjO2QJhsVQvBaKVbLr/ag8/G w==;
X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: epRbsoKoT9mPZI8qHXYhfw==
X-CSE-MsgGUID: X2VOxepcRUeBFv7xwgKtwA==
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Mar 2024 23:31:43 +0100
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2364249D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 23:31:42 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E524405EB; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 23:31:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 8BDE7380FB; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 23:31:42 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 23:31:42 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <Zfy1TuzigKQ1Njb5@Space.Net>
References: <6de22cfd-b845-bd65-5b79-bc05f1eee1e8@gmail.com> <D6FA6215-DB44-47AE-AB5B-9C5DD51E08EA@isc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6X/aGyv6sQ8fzJ/g"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D6FA6215-DB44-47AE-AB5B-9C5DD51E08EA@isc.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/GHfYPiRvr5FCYbzbILWy-fIbtgA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 mostly for DS-Lite
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 22:31:50 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 07:00:44AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> I don???t see why we don???t make it work for every IPV6AAS.  It???s just a DHCPv4 option. We could most probably extend 108 to support it with a list of methods in the payload after the wait timer. No list implies 464XLAT.  The node would set its supported methods and the DHCP server would match against the methods it is configured for.  A registry of methods would be required.

the way to hell is paved with implementor options

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer,
                                           Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279