Re: [VCARDDAV] New Date Range Proposal
Markus Lorenz <lorenz@atlantika-arts.net> Thu, 14 October 2010 14:50 UTC
Return-Path: <lorenz@atlantika-arts.net>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9BF3A6959 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.988
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xVXpS1wNxhkT for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host46.sitepush.net (server20.server-centrum.de [213.239.241.46]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCFC3A68ED for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host46.sitepush.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED041FA0019 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:52:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from host46.sitepush.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server20.server-centrum.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0iVuLtK0uQz6 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:51:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (g226069188.adsl.alicedsl.de [92.226.69.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by host46.sitepush.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15F81FA0016 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:51:59 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4CB7190B.9090501@atlantika-arts.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:51:55 +0200
From: Markus Lorenz <lorenz@atlantika-arts.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: vcarddav@ietf.org
References: <443A4296-7568-4731-BC29-732951F36859@iannella.it> <4CAB1286.8010201@atlantika-arts.net> <74967108-1179-477B-8E7C-8119F0DEC26F@iannella.it> <4CAF14B6.5030903@viagenie.ca> <C3F94B45-CC5F-4137-8D56-53F96F4AC17B@iannella.it> <4CB6B28F.4070501@atlantika-arts.net> <80525961AB242A5CDC1B80F7@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <80525961AB242A5CDC1B80F7@caldav.corp.apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] New Date Range Proposal
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:50:44 -0000
Am 14.10.2010 15:15, schrieb Cyrus Daboo: > Hi Markus, > > --On October 14, 2010 9:34:39 AM +0200 Markus Lorenz > <lorenz@atlantika-arts.net> wrote: > >> What about a formal description like: >> >> date-range = date-and-or-time "/" date-and-or-time >> >> date-range-list = date-range *("," date-range) >> >> I'm not sure if "date-and-or-time" is the best solution, as it would >> allow values with only time and no date. But at the moment I couldn't >> think of a reason not to allow that. It shouldn't be the problem of the >> vCard format whether or not a given date-range is meaningful. >> >> With "date-range-list" we're quite near to being able to define business >> hours for work phone numbers. We'd only have to introduce weekdays. >> Don't know if anyone would like that. I guess this information could >> already be included in the iCalendar to which FBURL points. At least for >> the whole vCard and not a specific communications property. > > Well that is a slippery slope because if you want to refer to recurring > times then you need to take timezones (Daylight Saving Time rules) into > account. I really don't think we should go there. If we do stick with a > full date-time option here then we need to be clear about the timezone - > either we pick UTC always, or allow a TZID parameter to be encoded > somehow, but that would be awkward given that this item is itself a > parameter. You're right. It would become much to complex. I was just venting my thoughts. :) > What I would prefer is to drop the time component altogether and just go > with dates only - I think that covers the majority of use cases and is > sufficient level of granularity. If you want to specify something like > work hours etc then that should be done by a pointer to an iCalendar > object (or we define a way to embed an iCalendar object directly in the > vCard - which is interesting because we also want to have iCalendar > objects that reference vCards). +1
- [VCARDDAV] Past ORGs? Renato Iannella
- Re: [VCARDDAV] Past ORGs? Markus Lorenz
- Re: [VCARDDAV] Past ORGs? Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [VCARDDAV] Past ORGs? Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] Past ORGs? Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] Past ORGs? Joseph Smarr
- Re: [VCARDDAV] Past ORGs? Renato Iannella
- Re: [VCARDDAV] Past ORGs? Simon Perreault
- [VCARDDAV] New Date Range Proposal Renato Iannella
- Re: [VCARDDAV] New Date Range Proposal Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [VCARDDAV] New Date Range Proposal Renato Iannella
- Re: [VCARDDAV] New Date Range Proposal Markus Lorenz
- Re: [VCARDDAV] New Date Range Proposal Renato Iannella
- Re: [VCARDDAV] New Date Range Proposal Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [VCARDDAV] New Date Range Proposal Renato Iannella
- Re: [VCARDDAV] New Date Range Proposal Markus Lorenz