IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] I-D Action:draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev-12.txt

"Javier Godoy" <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar> Wed, 21 July 2010 23:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0B23A6902 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.379, BAYES_00=-2.599, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wdy8ts8Emslf for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fich.unl.edu.ar (fich.unl.edu.ar [168.96.132.90]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658C13A6946 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Javier2 ([190.193.109.175]) (authenticated user rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar) by fich.unl.edu.ar (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits)); Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:37:29 -0300
Message-ID: <9FB874FB75E243BF86643E29DCEED841@Javier2>
From: Javier Godoy <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>, vcarddav@ietf.org
References: <20100712153053.60EA53A699C@core3.amsl.com> <4C3B3F2D.1000708@viagenie.ca><4C3B63B8.80507@viagenie.ca> <4C431086.2080706@atlantika-arts.net> <5334F2C6D20F4495800A900F77F205A9@Javier2><AANLkTinP7Gt7-6kJ4XrGg2kfIHXvTSeyArODHArUoUwR@mail.gmail.com> <4C470C06.4030108@viagenie.ca>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:15:25 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] I-D Action:draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev-12.txt
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:37:14 -0000

Simon Perreault wrote,

>On 2010-07-21 10:55, Barry Leiba wrote:
>>    One must be particularly careful when using LANGUAGE parameters with
>>    properties that may have cardinality greater than one.  If a LANGUAGE
>>    parameter is specified on ANY instance of such a property, then one
>>    MUST be specified on ALL instances that are translations of the same
>>    property value.
>
>+1, with "and MUST have a PID parameter with the same value".

+1 too.


BTW, should we say that "all instances that are translations of the same value
SHOULD/MUST be assigned to the same group, if the group construct is used for
any of them"?

The following is obviously nosense:
 GRP1.TITLE;LANGUAGE=fr;PID=1:Directeur de la recherche
 GRP2.TITLE;LANGUAGE=en;PID=1:Director of Research

In this example, the translations (which are related because they are a single
logical value) are also unrelated because they belong to different groups.


Best Regards

Javier

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email