IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Yes

Andrew McMillan <andrew@morphoss.com> Wed, 29 September 2010 23:07 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew@morphoss.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4647A3A69DD for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.046
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.046 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Fv6dFTfxlzW for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.morphoss.com (hoppy.mcmillan.net.nz [202.78.240.82]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721683A6835 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.morphoss.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69753203FD for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:08:07 +1300 (NZDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.morphoss.com
Received: from mail.morphoss.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hoppy.mcmillan.net.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 54sqzl9WYFjj for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:08:03 +1300 (NZDT)
Received: from [192.168.55.25] (home.mcmillan.net.nz [202.160.48.75]) (Authenticated sender: andrew@mail.morphoss.com) by mail.morphoss.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB372203FC for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:08:02 +1300 (NZDT)
From: Andrew McMillan <andrew@morphoss.com>
To: vcarddav@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4CA22DFA.4050301@viagenie.ca>
References: <77CB7F18F612E5E9A4FBC7ED@caldav.corp.apple.com> <4CA22DFA.4050301@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gAdg64Cvw2ZDN3vkxrd/"
Organization: Morphoss Ltd
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:06:49 +1300
Message-ID: <1285801609.24229.2341.camel@dave.home.mcmillan.net.nz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Yes
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: andrew@morphoss.com
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:07:30 -0000

On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:03 -0400, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> Hello,
>   I would like to get a wg concensus feel on this.
> 
> Question: do you think draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev and 
> draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardxml should be sent to IETF last call?
> 
> Please reply to the mailing list by adding a simple YES or NO at the end 
> of the subject line of this message.



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
andrew (AT) morphoss (DOT) com                            +64(272)DEBIAN
         Flexibility is overrated.  Constraints are liberating.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email