Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish?
Joseph Smarr <jsmarr@gmail.com> Fri, 01 October 2010 14:11 UTC
Return-Path: <jsmarr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90A23A6F18 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 07:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.727
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.727 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.871, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tBWzuOycgUCW for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 07:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com [74.125.83.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828FC3A6E3E for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 07:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pvg7 with SMTP id 7so1006562pvg.31 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; bh=ZDE4INjfsg34fJhPYBge5emkSoo/IFpK5hurPS0kAXM=; b=DjkEpNO4C0n0iaLxPLZZr+Hukl0SkPV7M00Tx1ZR9ywpanU1raiqAlwf5k0m4CKZbl ZPK0BBbXQaWsF+tXzlDRk3il9s6fjX4BTHsr6wpxLBUe4F+3nC6tDYA24ks7jg78g9vg TjiYzOvmUUIP8vn4gIYPjj03Q/cXsW7ER0DTI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; b=dAUHL18Sdgc9CzeqsOYih+7AT5/thtE66r1c563EG0PI1eOUxzji9U3o1wdNjnnNJd 5j2oVQFzzk7ZG2Oyqywmjsd1RCtoICvV06T7TuLGalAytGF23YMLfRoXdS4USBRkjbNw Naol4OEf/kLR4l4rWghd5hug7KiEvKVQ81nyQ=
Received: by 10.114.61.13 with SMTP id j13mr6349880waa.68.1285942305749; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.192.203 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 07:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7AB380FB-64A8-4EF7-AD8C-36836CA3549E@iannella.it>
References: <77CB7F18F612E5E9A4FBC7ED@caldav.corp.apple.com> <4CA22DFA.4050301@viagenie.ca> <7AB380FB-64A8-4EF7-AD8C-36836CA3549E@iannella.it>
From: Joseph Smarr <jsmarr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:11:24 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikfk4SrRtSycE07wVhAaP9FTgWydSB_U8n75K4J@mail.gmail.com>
To: Renato Iannella <renato@iannella.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016364178c355fb5e04918ec6d6"
Cc: CardDAV <vcarddav@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish?
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jsmarr@stanfordalumni.org
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:11:08 -0000
To be clear, everyone is aware of vCard, so the fact that several groups chose not to reuse these current drafts might make you "take notice" that lots of people in this field find them unacceptable as is. :) On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Renato Iannella <renato@iannella.it> wrote: > > On 29 Sep 2010, at 04:03, Marc Blanchet wrote: > > > Question: do you think draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev and > draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardxml should be sent to IETF last call? > > YES > > (I do have concerns, but they are mainly related to other groups who have > not reused vCard and reinvented similar semantics...so by moving these > forward, they may take notice (or not;-( ) > > Cheers > > Renato Iannella > http://renato.iannella.it > > _______________________________________________ > VCARDDAV mailing list > VCARDDAV@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav >
- Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard 4 - let's publish Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? YES Peter Saint-Andre
- [VCARDDAV] vCard 4 - let's publish Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard 4 - let's publish Mike Douglass
- Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard 4 - let's publish Joseph Smarr
- Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard 4 - let's publish Julian Reschke
- Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard 4 - let's publish Mike Douglass
- Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard 4 - let's publish Mark Paterson
- [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Marc Blanchet
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? YES Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Yes Dave Thewlis
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? YES Daisuke Miyakawa
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? YES Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? YES Joseph Smarr
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? YES Julian Reschke
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Kevin Marks
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? YES Andy Mabbett
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Kepeng Li
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Yes Andrew McMillan
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? YES Kurt Zeilenga
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Renato Iannella
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Joseph Smarr
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Joseph Smarr
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Julian Reschke
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Renato Iannella
- Re: [VCARDDAV] wg concensus to publish? Julian Reschke