Re: [VCARDDAV] KIND in draft 15

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 20 December 2010 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF3F3A6AB9 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:02:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.439
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.139, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wknFSNFerdsQ for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:02:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487ED3A6AB5 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:02:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (ringo.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000::67]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DE54210BA; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:04:41 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4D0FA8C9.7080201@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:04:41 -0500
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101103 Fedora/1.0-0.33.b2pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
References: <AANLkTikckYf5A0rUZ6k=JN2UZwp+__bBFHndxbfLcEHK@mail.gmail.com> <4D0B6AC9.1080607@viagenie.ca> <4D0B83AE.4060601@stpeter.im> <AANLkTimA-AuKRoOm6ZRmqSTmOBzHkWCah52ezCJCmvVp@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimA-AuKRoOm6ZRmqSTmOBzHkWCah52ezCJCmvVp@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] KIND in draft 15
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:02:49 -0000

On 2010-12-20 13:59, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> However I *also* think that
> 
> * GROUP
> 
> should be dropped from 6.1.4 and also be put into such an extension.

Note that the working group consensus from Beijing seems to be pointing
in the other direction.

> In my opinion, "GROUP" is far more abstract (lacks documented real
> world user interfaces / implementations - if not - please cite the
> research documentation) than *either* LIST or ROBOT.

I have used tons of address book programs that let me organize contacts
into groups... Is my experience not ordinary?

> Whereas right now, in my Gmail contacts for example, I *do* have
> *several* email addresses (and thus contacts) for LISTs and ROBOTs.  I
> don't have any for GROUPs.

Can you point at the GUI elements in Gmail that let you tag these
addresses as LISTs and ROBOTs?

Actually, Gmail is a good example of a UA that lets you organize
contacts into groups.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca