IETF Logo Mail Archive

[websec] font sniffing - Re: Are all the issues filed? (was: Re: Using IETF Tracker for issues on MIME sniffing?)

Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Mon, 24 October 2011 03:17 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964FD21F86A6 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.778
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.778 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id URRhVjgjIegY for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lvps83-169-7-107.dedicated.hosteurope.de (www.gondrom.org [83.169.7.107]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C156721F86A4 for <websec@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=sHP7CscvWsjaEyLoOjHiKLUG8Tvnfd36tDAJ5c9Xiy79IHvba9oISxi2bnF6lF/c29JZ6YcTMbcbvVqJESNMwvC5KWkHoZOpgy/WsPeU0DGWv8mNFNv3dmBdkLn9gk5k; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type;
Received: (qmail 23895 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2011 05:17:14 +0200
Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.5.5.61?) (61.8.220.69) by www.gondrom.org with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 24 Oct 2011 05:17:13 +0200
Message-ID: <4EA4D8B8.7010108@gondrom.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 04:17:12 +0100
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110923 Thunderbird/7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: websec@ietf.org
References: <CAJE5ia82hhiyQHboBg5cWLe_=VdSZ1pFgFi0_TiiwgJKxKesfw@mail.gmail.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D0605EFA3B4@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D0605EFA3B4@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010508010609090907080403"
Subject: [websec] font sniffing - Re: Are all the issues filed? (was: Re: Using IETF Tracker for issues on MIME sniffing?)
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 03:17:36 -0000

On 24/10/11 01:04, Larry Masinter wrote:
> I'd meant to do more careful write-ups of the issues I put into the tracker, but I've put in the main issues left over from draft-masinter-mime-sniff.
>
> The document also contains several sections (on sniffing fonts, for example) which are left as TBD. I suppose each of those is a separate "issue" to fill out.
>
> Larry
>

Thank you Larry.

I have a question regarding font sniffing:
Besides the short discussion at the last meetings, I do not recall much 
interest for that on the mailing-list. So, I am not sure how much 
interests really exists for the working group to be addressing that?
(i.e. adding content-types for fonts and adding them to the mime-sniff 
draft...)
Am I mistaken?

Kind regards, Tobias

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email