Re: [websec] font sniffing - Re: Are all the issues filed? (was: Re: Using IETF Tracker for issues on MIME sniffing?)

Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> Mon, 24 October 2011 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@adambarth.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273F221F8AA8 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.228, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X2QG2KjNDkbV for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F4D21F8A35 for <websec@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iabn5 with SMTP id n5so8483133iab.31 for <websec@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.44.199 with SMTP id uh7mr38850302icb.25.1319426568337; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z10sm56202358ibv.9.2011.10.23.20.22.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iabn5 with SMTP id n5so8483093iab.31 for <websec@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.41.9 with SMTP id m9mr9024199ibe.96.1319426566079; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.205.144 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4EA4D8B8.7010108@gondrom.org>
References: <CAJE5ia82hhiyQHboBg5cWLe_=VdSZ1pFgFi0_TiiwgJKxKesfw@mail.gmail.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D0605EFA3B4@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <4EA4D8B8.7010108@gondrom.org>
From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:22:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJE5ia_sqWuEfr3u=i6B8WbvnK=kuiQx9-dDX4OMRE5-Qjt8Eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [websec] font sniffing - Re: Are all the issues filed? (was: Re: Using IETF Tracker for issues on MIME sniffing?)
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 03:22:49 -0000

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Tobias Gondrom
<tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> wrote:
> On 24/10/11 01:04, Larry Masinter wrote:
>
> I'd meant to do more careful write-ups of the issues I put into the tracker,
> but I've put in the main issues left over from draft-masinter-mime-sniff.
>
> The document also contains several sections (on sniffing fonts, for example)
> which are left as TBD. I suppose each of those is a separate "issue" to fill
> out.
>
> Larry
>
>
> Thank you Larry.
>
> I have a question regarding font sniffing:
> Besides the short discussion at the last meetings, I do not recall much
> interest for that on the mailing-list. So, I am not sure how much interests
> really exists for the working group to be addressing that?
> (i.e. adding content-types for fonts and adding them to the mime-sniff
> draft...)
> Am I mistaken?

I added to the TODOs to the spec at the request of Anne van Kesteren.
I have some notes about how how font sniffing is supposed to work, but
I haven't researched it thoroughly.  I don't recall anyone else asking
for it specifically.

Adam