Re: [websec] font sniffing

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 09 November 2011 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7519821F8C65 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:44:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mz9WeSAcpHQr for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:44:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A3C21F8C5C for <websec@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:44:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from normz.cisco.com (unknown [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D667F41FC7; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:50:19 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4EBABBF6.4060009@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:44:22 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
References: <CAJE5ia82hhiyQHboBg5cWLe_=VdSZ1pFgFi0_TiiwgJKxKesfw@mail.gmail.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D0605EFA3B4@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <4EA4D8B8.7010108@gondrom.org> <op.v3umd8p264w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local> <4EA52C49.1090308@gondrom.org> <op.v3umz3sv64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local> <4EA6143D.8060009@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <op.v3vysenw64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local> <4EA65768.60205@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4EA65A59.6010005@gondrom.org> <4EBAB866.2020209@stpeter.im> <CAJE5ia9sU+g6WZC4wb5MEFCqb=TceaFD2yLMXe3f1e5T=h=VSA@mail.gmail.com> <4EBABAEC.6000907@stpeter.im> <op.v4owtlus64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
In-Reply-To: <op.v4owtlus64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [websec] font sniffing
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:44:24 -0000

On 11/9/11 10:42 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:39:56 -0800, Peter Saint-Andre
> <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
>> Based on Anne's previous message to this list [1], it seems that we're
>> actually talking about font representation formats (his examples are
>> TrueType Collection, OpenType, TrueType, and Web Open Font Format)
>> instead of particular fonts (e.g., "12pt Georgia Bold Italic") or
>> typefaces (e.g., "Georgia").
>>
>> Correct?
>
> Yes. Font formats, not font families.

Thanks for the clarification. That makes like much easier. :)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/