Re: [websec] request for feedback on adoption of drafts to WG - until Dec-16

Dear all,

thank you very much for your feedback and input.
>From reading all comments, I can see we have consensus to adopt the
three documents.

To the authors: please resubmit your drafts in the next couple of days
as websec WG drafts.

Wishing you all a merry Christmas and happy New Year and a good holiday!

Many greetings, Tobias

On 12/09/2010 06:46 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> Hello dear fellow websec members,
>>
>> during the hasmat BOF in July and the websec charter consensus three
>> individual drafts were listed as to be worked on as first items in our
>> working group. I did so far not formally ask for WG consensus on adopting
>> these three documents until now; our area director suggested that it would
>> be appropriate to do so before they are re-submitted as working group
>> drafts.
>>
>> So I would like to ask for your feedback on adopting the following three
>> individual drafts as WG documents (as outlined in the charter):
>>
>> - draft-abarth-origin:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-abarth-origin
>>
>> - hodges-strict-transport-sec:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-hodges-strict-transport-sec
>>
>> - draft-abarth-mime-sniff:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-abarth-mime-sniff
>>
>> Please reply ("yes" (for adoption) or "no" (against adoption), both are
>> important) - either for each draft individually or for all three drafts as a
>> bundle - to the list by Thurs 16th December 2010 (24:00GMT).
>>
>> Kind regards and thanks a lot,
>>
>> Tobias
>> chair of websec
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> websec mailing list
>> websec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
>>
>>