Re: [websec] request for feedback on adoption of drafts to WG - until Dec-16

Yes for all three (but I'm probably biased).

Adam

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Tobias Gondrom
<tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> wrote:
> Hello dear fellow websec members,
>
> during the hasmat BOF in July and the websec charter consensus three
> individual drafts were listed as to be worked on as first items in our
> working group. I did so far not formally ask for WG consensus on adopting
> these three documents until now; our area director suggested that it would
> be appropriate to do so before they are re-submitted as working group
> drafts.
>
> So I would like to ask for your feedback on adopting the following three
> individual drafts as WG documents (as outlined in the charter):
>
> - draft-abarth-origin:
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-abarth-origin
>
> - hodges-strict-transport-sec:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-hodges-strict-transport-sec
>
> - draft-abarth-mime-sniff:
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-abarth-mime-sniff
>
> Please reply ("yes" (for adoption) or "no" (against adoption), both are
> important) - either for each draft individually or for all three drafts as a
> bundle - to the list by Thurs 16th December 2010 (24:00GMT).
>
> Kind regards and thanks a lot,
>
> Tobias
> chair of websec
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> websec mailing list
> websec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
>
>