IETF Logo Mail Archive

[websec] request for feedback on adoption of drafts to WG - until Dec-16

Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Thu, 09 December 2010 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: websec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CA43A6958 for <websec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:27:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -94.459
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-94.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.555, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YJhjxL0Vcw1U for <websec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:27:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lvps83-169-7-107.dedicated.hosteurope.de (lvps83-169-7-107.dedicated.hosteurope.de [83.169.7.107]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F063A6980 for <websec@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:27:47 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=gN4J6FcDDIbkbBQv74Nyf8lI8afceS0fAdzhYueNBKDLCh7vdftJGnljeRrp37m8Bd2krK61JVoJE85Y9Zz513VTIJTA8D3onhlQUPgilm2xNeADza5Yy0V692pwwI+Z; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Disposition-Notification-To:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
Received: (qmail 24384 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2010 19:28:21 +0100
Received: from 94-194-102-93.zone8.bethere.co.uk (HELO seraphim.heaven) (94.194.102.93) by lvps83-169-7-107.dedicated.hosteurope.de with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 9 Dec 2010 19:28:21 +0100
Message-ID: <4D01201E.8000007@gondrom.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 18:29:50 +0000
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101026 SUSE/3.1.6 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: websec <websec@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [websec] request for feedback on adoption of drafts to WG - until Dec-16
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 18:27:56 -0000

Hello dear fellow websec members,

during the hasmat BOF in July and the websec charter consensus three individual drafts were listed as to be worked on as first items in our working group. I did so far not formally ask for WG consensus on adopting these three documents until now; our area director suggested that it would be appropriate to do so before they are re-submitted as working group drafts.

So I would like to ask for your feedback on adopting the following three individual drafts as WG documents (as outlined in the charter):

- draft-abarth-origin:
http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-abarth-origin" rel="nofollow">http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-abarth-origin
   
- hodges-strict-transport-sec:
  http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-hodges-strict-transport-sec" rel="nofollow">http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-hodges-strict-transport-sec

- draft-abarth-mime-sniff:
http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-abarth-mime-sniff" rel="nofollow">http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-abarth-mime-sniff

Please reply ("yes" (for adoption) or "no" (against adoption), both are important) - either for each draft individually or for all three drafts as a bundle - to the list by Thurs 16th December 2010 (24:00GMT).

Kind regards and thanks a lot,

Tobias
chair of websec


v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email