Re: [websec] request for feedback on adoption of drafts to WG - until Dec-16

Hello,

I would say yes though hodges-strict-transport-sec is about enforcing
secure HTTP transport which I though was out of the scope. Am I mistaken?

Regards,

Greg

12/10/10 に、Tobias Gondrom  <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> さんは書きました:

> Hello dear fellow websec members, 
> 
>     
> 
>     during the hasmat BOF in July and the websec charter consensus three
>     individual drafts were listed as to be worked on as first items in
>     our working group. I did so far not formally ask for WG consensus on
>     adopting these three documents until now; our area director
>     suggested that it would be appropriate to do so before they are
>     re-submitted as working group drafts. 
> 
>     
> 
>     So I would like to ask for your feedback on adopting the following
>     three individual drafts as WG documents (as outlined in the
>     charter): 
> 
>     
> 
>     - draft-abarth-origin: 
> 
>     http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-abarth-origin
> 
>         
> 
>     - hodges-strict-transport-sec: 
> 
>       http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-hodges-strict-transport-sec
> 
>     
> 
>     - draft-abarth-mime-sniff: 
> 
>     http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-abarth-mime-sniff
> 
>     
> 
>     Please reply ("yes" (for adoption) or "no" (against adoption), both
>     are important) - either for each draft individually or for all three
>     drafts as a bundle - to the list by Thurs 16th December 2010
>     (24:00GMT). 
> 
>     
> 
>     Kind regards and thanks a lot, 
> 
>     
> 
>     Tobias
> 
>     chair of websec
> 
>     
> 
>     
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> websec mailing list
> websec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec