Re: [websec] DISCUSS positions on draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 17 September 2014 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DB91A6F59; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AVUdT8dzvWTA; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x231.google.com (mail-ie0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 923E41A6EE8; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x19so2551331ier.8 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4RFZzKX/+e1KOM2E9Q6dci/cyL5DvThW+Egj3hn2WeI=; b=RLqpe7MR/nY/im4qxHPQPi7m2lxMx1zWjVvMedPTFsvXeiJjCCD6IZGB4KONOV7DP+ Qwd1m/zBU2pxyqGyYKtselqoZKGVAlo6tiw1IGvU5GWVkbpyUCTmx72DybdX4eIy4lk0 tVVbnF7loQDHEiS4FGjShqCBtf9490TiMJIEV31y9wMYaWfiW/0iEeC4xBPm07L08nHo mvpgKIr9JiQHPWUyQ75TENOCp3WF1Jyh79qcJG5jC5rCNHw6en+qqEBQsQ1gxWnqPg/f yLP8RCMWAyVxIHjYnroRwbystg86Oiq3dMzacLlPjG5ksNJCJuxJJFGHhCgC6drC/ZTk jUCg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.80.116 with SMTP id q20mr43181846igx.22.1410989713808; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.170.160 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVDiy-QbHNREsm07+iPzjDiZ1q5GjowZCBnP63nw1ezTAw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC4RtVDiy-QbHNREsm07+iPzjDiZ1q5GjowZCBnP63nw1ezTAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:35:13 +0300
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Yw3p23z8DQUlKuUFIe2PrTfxgS0
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVBg6Hx5iteZ+HHz=Lk8qbRUDA00EBbOG3FQp5U4ZjgS9A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/websec/y7Mb5gNCrdGhPAXVd0nUa9w46ms
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] DISCUSS positions on draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:35:19 -0000

How are we doing with this document?  Any progress on dealing with the
DISCUSSes and other comments?

Barry

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> Websec folks, and especially the document authors:
> We have several DISCUSS ballots on the key-pinning doc (from Stephen,
> Kathleen, and Ted):
>
>    http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning/ballot/
>
> ...and I have seen no response from the authors on them.  Please
> respond soonest, and have the necessary discussions to resolve them.
> Please also consider and respond to the non-blocking comments from
> Alissa, Pete, and Richard.
>
> Yoav, please stay on top of this and do the necessary prodding to keep
> this moving.
>
> Thanks,
> Barry