IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webtransport] Fwd: Magnus Westerlund's Block on charter-ietf-webtrans-00-00: (with BLOCK and COMMENT)

"Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net> Sat, 01 February 2020 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614D9120125; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 11:53:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=TzcPfelg; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=m8fvWBJb
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SHcozFmYQMBx; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 11:53:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE8D212007C; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 11:53:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB31421FB7; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 14:53:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 01 Feb 2020 14:53:45 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=U+n3cNJBspeo4RviE3L3u39h9xWk SoeuCFC932akkLg=; b=TzcPfelg1SvHcb8ThTSEiX42QTnbSFD8LlEh9ZFG14f+ foGsbE3AAWTLD1G4U+eLoljsn6GSnpYdcOGAXYfT9Z8JhJOcNbUA6hzsU6tbb7Ws szlO1/z7SptQkwwX0ps9MPbgWIp/1zdWAYruSP35dYY5Ot03939/USJU+P0MHw1e 4atdRZCSZo497UYfiJuD5pUKwEIeBDuDpjQPeWhgNt+Zq4cFbmjBwa8tkFnNZ3E9 hEwG1tXAzHepq0EDigrl4fmn3MKgT4s9Kky1pWs9ZgziPOcWWEXJEzHhVX58za6b c4+dYBu61bvuNc4ZsnN4GWSUap9MEZmZpqGidhk4hQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=U+n3cN JBspeo4RviE3L3u39h9xWkSoeuCFC932akkLg=; b=m8fvWBJbalrG03kSXQWzvF /WuVX8xhhMnufT7VK+oxr27LvMpK0RV7VixT1maPKn8ovCJ+dcd7hyprA0RPNsSn u27KnVSKjm7B2OfMim8AImwmGeE2hyxrUYlFVPmliOxh0XYRF/sYJHR4Kn1Ruvbc aDBIWl/yJ/VUJnf1Brr66foR56+9d/amvz2HPGWuifcTP7mYCNKW5UHO0OEGM6YC yvPo/IjExa/iVDsCt0XuEwmZm5aTVHc+yT9gvuOlSOYHxUg198qyAUzMw/ADG7Fk smIGE2p8SPxQdqFmqJp5BadTaGCJta+2p9jm3otUOzFdWfCDon3j0UHjVVC5lFLw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Sdc1XnF0eSc5mubz7lL25HnXhWP6oeakv_FWbHhoBlEXYSXjenniGA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrgedvgddufedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdforghr thhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuve hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohif vghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Sdc1Xu3ZsIZD6axeLsk7MGRAJzrfbpLc-tefIBZQom6mKJo0qNdZew> <xmx:Sdc1Xm87mitcbKIyJu6nuQIK4-iAp5BNADCFOliJ7s3auaBHOH3s7w> <xmx:Sdc1XiGf7Ubsh43Vw27U9J8yIeLP_8w48mxQY35AUxj1pV-D9aBB2Q> <xmx:Sdc1XrJxnLBEDRvqQFyOgT_Qc_V4nunaa80kLfVHUZMhpUlf6zoZuA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5DAA9E00A2; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 14:53:45 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-781-gfc16016-fmstable-20200127v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <fabe0d9c-6278-43e9-a401-bef30804107b@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D48C1258-E534-43A8-8BD1-73F7AE99D9B2@gmail.com>
References: <158048874973.21096.7146214036477975185.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D48C1258-E534-43A8-8BD1-73F7AE99D9B2@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2020 20:53:25 +0100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, webtransport@ietf.org
Cc: webtrans-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webtransport/56Ew4sEnaB0Fb1-3wfU9IoYqJs8>
Subject: Re: [Webtransport] Fwd: Magnus Westerlund's Block on charter-ietf-webtrans-00-00: (with BLOCK and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <webtransport.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webtransport/>
List-Post: <mailto:webtransport@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2020 19:53:48 -0000

On Sat, Feb 1, 2020, at 04:09, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> [BA] Would it be sufficient to add this clarification to the existing 
> sentence? The result would look like this.
> 
> The WebTransport working group will define new client-server protocols 
> or protocol extensions using QUIC or HTTP3 in order to support the 

I would instead say "building on existing protocol work" and then point out separately that this will definitely not define a new transport (or lower) layer protocol.

At Mozilla we are still uncertain about the set of protocols as currently proposed, and would feel uncomfortable limiting this to just those two *in the charter*.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email