[weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IESG this week

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Mon, 27 October 2014 04:38 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A554C1A1BBE for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cTSO1hLQp4pA for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50E141A1BB8 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1414384691; x=1445920691; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=QAfQl3L0qlpXe29U6QXPkXU2hwR0rHmHk9Cuevvp3N4=; b=XSf5V1vJxJH/eY/Z9ARFurG6GCibRFiDPqogZmiQVD2mjgs2IPWZx+7g Wm7rsy0OCoUhBIocMQVxajzT6BJACzvyFPTN9+Gr/iXD/5C/6tFv8vUzu KcdJk9sycRUGeijsKLMpOrkyv5GP720Kk4xQqDhY/JEfFkT5G9/yFI3pA M=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5600,1067,7603"; a="76879171"
Received: from ironmsg04-l.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.19]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 26 Oct 2014 21:38:10 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,792,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="737575428"
Received: from nasanexhc06.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.21]) by Ironmsg04-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 26 Oct 2014 21:38:10 -0700
Received: from NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.1) by nasanexhc06.na.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:38:09 -0700
Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (10.80.80.8) by NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.201.192) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.22; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:38:09 -0700
Message-ID: <544DCC30.7000005@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 23:38:08 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8]
X-ClientProxiedBy: NASANEXM01E.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.201.191) To NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.201.192)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/6dl9e2v-J8EO6IPvmM61wIpDbE4
Subject: [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IESG this week
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 04:38:12 -0000

I've been out of commission for several days due to a death in the 
family and I'm doing a bit of catch up. There have been quite a few Last 
Call/directorate review comments, but none of them seem to be 
showstoppers. So here's my question: Can the editors get out new 
versions Monday, 27 Aug, and I can ballot the documents with the new 
versions this week, or shall I push IESG Evaluation until right after 
Honolulu? I'd prefer the former if the editors can send out the new 
versions ASAP.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478