Re: [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IESG this week
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Mon, 27 October 2014 10:44 UTC
Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5CA1A1BD7 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0qoqvebjnzwO for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod6og121.obsmtp.com (exprod6og121.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC0A1A9095 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com ([72.13.63.41]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob121.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKVE4h/WOgjHF+Qc/ZpKk+e6QiECFXSQzE@postini.com; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:44:15 PDT
Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.205]) by brn1lxmailout01.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9RAiDLB015700 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 06:44:13 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 06:44:12 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Thread-Topic: [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IESG this week
Thread-Index: AQHP8Z/TX7tJiBjAN0CVQS4RL155yZxDxaMA///81RA=
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:44:12 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F49503C7F@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <544DCC30.7000005@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAL0qLwYG0wx=7C0w74sDF6_Y_6MGe8eXn2pU=2NVnXEYRY+=Jg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYG0wx=7C0w74sDF6_Y_6MGe8eXn2pU=2NVnXEYRY+=Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F49503C7FBRN1WNEXMBX01vc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/c-nyl_69afl6Tujp-0oBQHSbTo0
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IESG this week
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:44:30 -0000
I am. I’ll have new versions of rdap-query and rdap-sec out this morning. Scott From: weirds [mailto:weirds-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 2:55 AM To: Pete Resnick Cc: weirds@ietf.org Subject: Re: [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IESG this week On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com<mailto:presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>> wrote: I've been out of commission for several days due to a death in the family and I'm doing a bit of catch up. There have been quite a few Last Call/directorate review comments, but none of them seem to be showstoppers. So here's my question: Can the editors get out new versions Monday, 27 Aug, and I can ballot the documents with the new versions this week, or shall I push IESG Evaluation until right after Honolulu? I'd prefer the former if the editors can send out the new versions ASAP. s/Aug/Oct/ I agree, I didn't see anything that stopped us in our tracks or needs to go back to the WG for discussion. Does anyone disagree? Authors, are we ready to go? -MSK
- [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IESG t… Pete Resnick
- Re: [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IE… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IE… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IE… Andy Newton
- Re: [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IE… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IE… Ning Kong