IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IESG this week

Ning Kong <nkong@cnnic.cn> Mon, 27 October 2014 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <nkong@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0561A878B for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.438
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n80AtwKvs6eU for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00C21A874D for <weirds@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.106] (unknown [114.242.250.3]) by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0A5QJB+XU5UBMLGAA--.31660S2; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:58:08 +0800 (CST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8095B39C-2C51-4BFE-9008-52D629FAF7D2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: Ning Kong <nkong@cnnic.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYG0wx=7C0w74sDF6_Y_6MGe8eXn2pU=2NVnXEYRY+=Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:58:06 +0800
Message-Id: <B95E5C4E-ED68-4068-86EE-43F266C48588@cnnic.cn>
References: <544DCC30.7000005@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAL0qLwYG0wx=7C0w74sDF6_Y_6MGe8eXn2pU=2NVnXEYRY+=Jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0A5QJB+XU5UBMLGAA--.31660S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW7GF48GrykKr1kAw1xXr4fXwb_yoWDuFg_WF 1kJFy8Aw4UJw4Yqw4rAwnrCr43JFWFgry3t345XrnxX340y34kJF4kKasIv34fWry8Wr98 Gr1ftry8G3y7WjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbrAYjsxI4VWxJwAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I 6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM2 8CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUCVW8JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0 cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8JVWxJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z2 80aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487McIj6xIIjxv20xvE 14v26r106r15McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2 IYc2Ij64vIr41l7480Y4vEI4kI2Ix0rVAqx4xJMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCa FVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_Jr Wlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUXVWUAwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j 6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_WF yUJVCq3wCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8JVWxJwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4U JbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUw6wZDUUUU
X-CM-SenderInfo: xqnr0ww6fq0xffof0/
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/Ck_zYq7HUdwHU2ljStLCcii5sUI
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IESG this week
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:58:20 -0000

draft-ietf-weirds-object-inventory-06 was just posted.

Cheers,
Ning


> 在 2014年10月27日，下午2:54，Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> 写道：
> 
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com <mailto:presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>> wrote:
> I've been out of commission for several days due to a death in the family and I'm doing a bit of catch up. There have been quite a few Last Call/directorate review comments, but none of them seem to be showstoppers. So here's my question: Can the editors get out new versions Monday, 27 Aug, and I can ballot the documents with the new versions this week, or shall I push IESG Evaluation until right after Honolulu? I'd prefer the former if the editors can send out the new versions ASAP.
> 
> s/Aug/Oct/
> 
> I agree, I didn't see anything that stopped us in our tracks or needs to go back to the WG for discussion.  Does anyone disagree?  Authors, are we ready to go?
> 
> -MSK
> _______________________________________________
> weirds mailing list
> weirds@ietf.org <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email