IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IESG this week

Andy Newton <andy@hxr.us> Mon, 27 October 2014 10:57 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA28F1A9092 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eQM9pnBX7Ntn for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com (mail-qa0-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D732D1A90C1 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id u7so1224936qaz.39 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=uzLtcsylRMtz0SHiHD7c7x/5mlcjkH1I/sR7FG1kh00=; b=QGgfGOZWmAExWSH2XDJLFy54Xv6xjd6fjNiDTzxvpgOmCSsf+3oW+2/RhjZYzFw9ha u/GwfGydHcJusYHPgyP6V2xbZtv9UYSih5bIz2TAsfMnmmIoET61zgv7Xpq7QeW4S7Cv 0Z618HJXNZFuQ/ns4aBqGa6Dh79qsl75qA6yOFZ/2S6ZPXDjwxLkOD6VA9QKbkST+1Xe WWG25i1ulk/aHLtwqLzMge40zPhIUd4/D1pV5uuH70mnUdXyvEd56+1TKjrbN9U7xVOg exnN3rMjCiXhLOexKLsssoXgwojpw6eCnMg+1F51fezlg5Owh0px7iXvZdX7+N2mwM03 XkQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmRrjleoeNnUcNwTYcQ3rLqP/6pp0gt8y0aC5S/0NzPwgwczdwItE4m/fxy1hYbTIynIzdV
X-Received: by 10.140.101.120 with SMTP id t111mr30503267qge.6.1414407463976; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.232.199.64] (mobile-166-173-250-121.mycingular.net. [166.173.250.121]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 44sm4172045qgk.24.2014.10.27.03.57.41 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 03:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-77C2EBBD-1A23-4BEB-9DE8-024970CA8FBA"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Andy Newton <andy@hxr.us>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12A405)
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYG0wx=7C0w74sDF6_Y_6MGe8eXn2pU=2NVnXEYRY+=Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 06:57:40 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <D3720706-7459-4993-A1A3-7ED1C8554296@hxr.us>
References: <544DCC30.7000005@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAL0qLwYG0wx=7C0w74sDF6_Y_6MGe8eXn2pU=2NVnXEYRY+=Jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/hAZ0JpYnq5uB-rHcf1PRnipL-0c
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] WEIRDS docs - "Go" or "No go" for IESG this week
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:57:49 -0000

I am traveling today and won't be able to get anything out. But I can shoot for tomorrow if that works.

-andy 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 27, 2014, at 2:54 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>> I've been out of commission for several days due to a death in the family and I'm doing a bit of catch up. There have been quite a few Last Call/directorate review comments, but none of them seem to be showstoppers. So here's my question: Can the editors get out new versions Monday, 27 Aug, and I can ballot the documents with the new versions this week, or shall I push IESG Evaluation until right after Honolulu? I'd prefer the former if the editors can send out the new versions ASAP.
> 
> s/Aug/Oct/
> 
> I agree, I didn't see anything that stopped us in our tracks or needs to go back to the WG for discussion.  Does anyone disagree?  Authors, are we ready to go?
> 
> -MSK
> _______________________________________________
> weirds mailing list
> weirds@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email