[wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known URI: genid
Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> Wed, 31 August 2011 15:47 UTC
Return-Path: <sandro@w3.org>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C6821F8C21 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gjbhUd9oecES for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jay.w3.org (ssh.w3.org [128.30.52.60]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85FA21F8BEE for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 31-34-238.wireless.csail.mit.edu ([128.31.34.238]) by jay.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <sandro@w3.org>) id 1Qyn1o-0000Ff-QY for wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 11:48:36 -0400
From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
To: IETF wellknown-uri Review List <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Organization: World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 11:48:36 -0400
Message-ID: <1314805716.2186.74.camel@waldron>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known URI: genid
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wellknown-uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:47:07 -0000
The W3C RDF Working Group is producing a specification for how RDF blank nodes can be safely and usefully mapped (Skolemized) into IRIs, through the use of well-known URIs. The latest Working Draft of "RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax" includes such a spec as section 6.6.1. The permanent URL for this latest version of this text is: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-rdf11-concepts-20110830/#section-skolemization I don't know whether this should be registered now, or if we should wait until the document is farther along the W3C standards track. The Working Group has consensus on the current design and the string "genid" [1], but there has not yet been wide public review, and the document is still a Working Draft. The current schedule [2] has the document completing its public review phase and becoming a Candidate Recommendation in August 2012; perhaps we should wait until then, as long as no one else is going to use the string in the meantime. Also, should the registration template go in an email like this one, or be an appendix to the spec? Thanks for your help, -- Sandro (W3C staff contact, RDF Working Group) [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-05-25#resolution_2 [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/01/rdf-wg-charter#deliverables
- [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known URI… Sandro Hawke
- Re: [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known… Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known… Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known… Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known… Sandro Hawke
- Re: [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known… Mark Nottingham