Re: [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known URI: genid

I would prefer waiting until it is considered stable (both document and definition). I am happy to perform an early review if you submit the complete template.

EHL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wellknown-uri-review-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:wellknown-uri-
> review-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sandro Hawke
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 8:49 AM
> To: IETF wellknown-uri Review List
> Subject: [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known URI: genid
> 
> The W3C RDF Working Group is producing a specification for how RDF blank
> nodes can be safely and usefully mapped (Skolemized) into IRIs, through the
> use of well-known URIs.  The latest Working Draft of "RDF 1.1 Concepts and
> Abstract Syntax" includes such a spec as section 6.6.1.
> 
> The permanent URL for this latest version of this text is:
>         http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-rdf11-concepts-20110830/#section-
> skolemization
> 
> I don't know whether this should be registered now, or if we should wait
> until the document is farther along the W3C standards track.  The Working
> Group has consensus on the current design and the string "genid" [1], but
> there has not yet been wide public review, and the document is still a
> Working Draft. The current schedule [2] has the document completing its
> public review phase and becoming a Candidate Recommendation in August
> 2012; perhaps we should wait until then, as long as no one else is going to use
> the string in the meantime.
> 
> Also, should the registration template go in an email like this one, or be an
> appendix to the spec?
> 
> Thanks for your help,
> 
>    -- Sandro   (W3C staff contact, RDF Working Group)
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-05-25#resolution_2
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/01/rdf-wg-charter#deliverables
> 
> _______________________________________________
> wellknown-uri-review mailing list
> wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review