Re: [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known URI: genid

Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> Sun, 04 September 2011 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D684C21F85A4 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 15:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LWbyqSaG5RS7 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 15:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D24C21F858D for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 15:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 28187 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2011 22:33:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.47) by p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 4 Sep 2011 22:33:25 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.19]) by P3PW5EX1HT005.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.134]) with mapi; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 15:33:25 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>, "wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org" <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:31:33 -0700
Thread-Topic: [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known URI: genid
Thread-Index: Acxn+22/wMpB09xlRRWmA3A6biP7QgDVuSmg
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E7234518A4F23D4@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <1314805716.2186.74.camel@waldron> <4E5E61F7.6080808@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E5E61F7.6080808@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known URI: genid
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wellknown-uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:31:44 -0000

No. You can ask the DE (currently me) to register based on my assessment if the specification and registration is sufficiently stable.

EHL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wellknown-uri-review-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:wellknown-uri-
> review-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mykyta Yevstifeyev
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 9:32 AM
> To: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known URI: genid
> 
> 31.08.2011 18:48, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> > The W3C RDF Working Group is producing a specification for how RDF
> > blank nodes can be safely and usefully mapped (Skolemized) into IRIs,
> > through the use of well-known URIs.  The latest Working Draft of "RDF
> > 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax" includes such a spec as section 6.6.1.
> >
> > The permanent URL for this latest version of this text is:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-rdf11-concepts-20110830/#section-
> skolemiz
> > ation
> >
> > I don't know whether this should be registered now, or if we should
> > wait until the document is farther along the W3C standards track.  The
> > Working Group has consensus on the current design and the string
> > "genid" [1], but there has not yet been wide public review, and the
> > document is still a Working Draft. The current schedule [2] has the
> > document completing its public review phase and becoming a Candidate
> > Recommendation in August 2012; perhaps we should wait until then, as
> > long as no one else is going to use the string in the meantime.
> 
> Well, you may ask IANA to register it now but update the registration when
> the recommendation level is reached.
> 
> >
> > Also, should the registration template go in an email like this one,
> > or be an appendix to the spec?
> 
> You could have the IANA Considerations section with the template and
> request for the action.
> 
> Mykyta Yevstifeyev
> 
> >
> > Thanks for your help,
> >
> >     -- Sandro   (W3C staff contact, RDF Working Group)
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-05-25#resolution_2
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/01/rdf-wg-charter#deliverables
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wellknown-uri-review mailing list
> > wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> wellknown-uri-review mailing list
> wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review