Re: [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known URI: genid

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Wed, 31 August 2011 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DCE21F8D4A for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ETV1MPn00kdW for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515E621F8D41 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkar4 with SMTP id r4so1221473bka.31 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nxkPFePIfwjcRilFOIaTOUQv0S89ESYz3DbQVmrdvAI=; b=LTQcuE2HJmAfkcmRC87H3LvEwBzLLmqew+Cv0nL0nX5us7ieUz9MNKYDsrZmPsrWWg 39vBS/eGO2XDSFv+m5mv06hL30qgfYXHPuYeS4umsnnDEPXXkRDmExkn8M1KJNXKuYdz 8KL1I+3lzUDsWC69mQs91IYnFWSZfD1gggGgo=
Received: by 10.204.138.199 with SMTP id b7mr338300bku.117.1314808280307; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f9sm437266bkt.36.2011.08.31.09.31.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E5E61F7.6080808@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:31:51 +0300
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
References: <1314805716.2186.74.camel@waldron>
In-Reply-To: <1314805716.2186.74.camel@waldron>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [wellknown-uri-review] Request for well-known URI: genid
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wellknown-uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:29:51 -0000

31.08.2011 18:48, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> The W3C RDF Working Group is producing a specification for how RDF blank
> nodes can be safely and usefully mapped (Skolemized) into IRIs, through
> the use of well-known URIs.  The latest Working Draft of "RDF 1.1
> Concepts and Abstract Syntax" includes such a spec as section 6.6.1.
>
> The permanent URL for this latest version of this text is:
>          http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-rdf11-concepts-20110830/#section-skolemization
>
> I don't know whether this should be registered now, or if we should
> wait until the document is farther along the W3C standards track.  The
> Working Group has consensus on the current design and the string
> "genid" [1], but there has not yet been wide public review, and the
> document is still a Working Draft. The current schedule [2] has the
> document completing its public review phase and becoming a Candidate
> Recommendation in August 2012; perhaps we should wait until then, as
> long as no one else is going to use the string in the meantime.

Well, you may ask IANA to register it now but update the registration 
when the recommendation level is reached.

>
> Also, should the registration template go in an email like this one, or
> be an appendix to the spec?

You could have the IANA Considerations section with the template and 
request for the action.

Mykyta Yevstifeyev

>
> Thanks for your help,
>
>     -- Sandro   (W3C staff contact, RDF Working Group)
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-05-25#resolution_2
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/01/rdf-wg-charter#deliverables
>
> _______________________________________________
> wellknown-uri-review mailing list
> wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review
>