IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Arguments wanted....

Tony Genovese <genovese@ophelia.nersc.gov> Tue, 16 November 1993 17:50 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08719; 16 Nov 93 12:50 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08715; 16 Nov 93 12:50 EST
Received: from mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14403; 16 Nov 93 12:50 EST
X400-Received: by mta mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu in /PRMD=XNREN/ADMD= /C=US/; Relayed; Tue, 16 Nov 1993 11:48:30 +0000
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1993 11:48:30 +0000
X400-Originator: ietf-osi-x400ops-req@cs.wisc.edu
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=XNREN/ADMD= /C=US/; mhs-relay..778:16.10.93.17.48.30]
Priority: Non-Urgent
DL-Expansion-History: ietf-osi-x400ops@cs.wisc.edu ; Tue, 16 Nov 1993 11:48:29 +0000;
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Tony Genovese <genovese@ophelia.nersc.gov>
Message-ID: <9311161748.AA11036@ophelia.nersc.gov>
To: Christian Huitema <Christian.Huitema@sophia.inria.fr>
Cc: ietf-osi-x400ops@cs.wisc.edu, rd-mhs-managers@chx400.switch.ch
Subject: Re: Arguments wanted....

--------
>
>But there is yet a much better answer. As the PRMD/ADMD business is strictly
>related to one transmission standard, i.e. X.400, the correct answer is to
>drop X.400 and just use TCP-IP, SMTP, RFC-822 and MIME!
>
>

  I like Christian's recommendation but, if you feel you must keep
X.400; CH could go the same way the US is trying with A=IMX.

Tony...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email