IETF Logo Mail Archive

[yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 02 October 2009 05:13 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C653A690F for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 22:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.129, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X5KzU4oRh6Rs for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 22:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22503A68B2 for <yam@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 22:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from subman.elandsys.com ([41.136.232.244]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n925F1aI025793 for <yam@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 22:15:07 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1254460508; x=1254546908; bh=yUeqL11+ZIDi7A4Pf89ZzKlAMYc=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=oJrviuQ6d14pnebZXKUvuEbSsKK0PyEkQGVfkjtY7hiHbP8hgt6JbWOEz9Z2ikooe 4dK07h5HEFCVdncY3Ja43Zif8mEuNiKW4ktiGEkMXhpCgFoZu481slYqcbwGG+iZ2f hHya3eGnlXLZgCRsktUE/xEjcHtSFefiLlNZUFK8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20091001214325.03199178@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:03:56 -0700
To: yam@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: [yam] Status: draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 05:13:43 -0000

This message is about the status of 
draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00.  The deployment report ( 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/yam/trac/wiki/DeployReport1652 ) will 
be submitted with the revised I-D.  I will be acting as Document 
Shepherd for the two I-Ds.  A write-up was not required for 
draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00.

There was a SecDir review ( 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg58589.html 
).  The document will be evaluated by the IESG on October 8th.

There is a Discuss from Adrian Farrel ( 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/ballot/3211/ ).  The comments 
are about the process.

Please note that the procedure used for this process experiment may 
be changed once the Working Group receives feedback.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy
YAM WG Secretary

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email