IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-03

Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz> Thu, 07 May 2020 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7727A3A097D; Wed, 6 May 2020 23:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EuP24bThdTXN; Wed, 6 May 2020 23:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trail.lhotka.name (trail.lhotka.name [77.48.224.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8AD43A0975; Wed, 6 May 2020 23:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix, from userid 109) id 1327A8600AB; Thu, 7 May 2020 08:38:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [172.29.2.100]) by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B8DE860051; Thu, 7 May 2020 08:38:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>
To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>, "Wubo (lana)" <lana.wubo@huawei.com>
Cc: "yang-doctors@ietf.org" <yang-doctors@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang.all@ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <984B0D7E-B78B-47DE-AB08-2ADD64A3CDFD@cisco.com>
References: <ddcdeabe7c6b4a9eb13132a17bc2d236@huawei.com> <984B0D7E-B78B-47DE-AB08-2ADD64A3CDFD@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 08:38:29 +0200
Message-ID: <874kssw8pm.fsf@nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/7B0g_TOkYlB_VviMuHdiodfkcnY>
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-03
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 06:38:38 -0000

"Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com> writes:

>> - Is it correct that the server type may be either one of "authentication", "authorization" or "accounting", or all of them? Is it impossible for a server to be authentication & authorization but not accounting? Such a variant cannot be configured.
>> [Bo] OK, will correct when the final guidance on this issue is received.
>
> Lada replied yesterday to say that the bit string is likely preferred similar to access-operations in ietf-netconf-acm.  I might personally discourage the use of ‘*’ for this given that there are only three types, but that’s just my individual thought.

+1

I think it is better to have all three types explicitly in the value. Perhaps this could also be the default?

Lada

>
> Joe
>

-- 
Ladislav Lhotka 
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email