Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review
Alanna Paloma
2024-04-02
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/B4ZHOeKl5r34zp_endDv9VC0Wwk/
3444674
2123961
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review
Carsten Bormann
2024-04-01
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/HtuYzLictTPWMIJTwHQYFzvoQzQ/
3444162
2123961
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review
Alanna Paloma
2024-04-01
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/4T7QxtqpSVG1GWbstEeSZiageaw/
3444151
2123961
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review
Alanna Paloma
2024-03-22
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/99vRGghFueq0Bdnk-7GzwnAckds/
3441661
2123961
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review
Carsten Bormann
2024-03-20
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/JZvs-skvFCYHQEhl5WdMFKDqKrQ/
3440130
2123961
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review
Alanna Paloma
2024-03-14
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/ESotihU-6kRSf1pH2pbqvf5wfE0/
3437083
2123961
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review
Carsten Bormann
2024-03-12
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/Ln_6AZhZKTfOEa4tL6H5gAXkUX0/
3436247
2123961
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9557 <draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-11> for your review
rfc-editor
2024-03-12
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/Hicb3Pp7W03M1Lw5GWj_xFNjQU8/
3436025
2123961
Re: [Sedate] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [Sedate] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Carsten Bormann
2023-10-13
sedate
None
/arch/msg/sedate/6nmfRCcDZvqzvCD1E_MGsFjKrQs/
3367621
2090029
[Sedate] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)[Sedate] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-extended-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Lars Eggert via Datatracker
2023-10-13
sedate
None
/arch/msg/sedate/QQQSPRsSRRtjJPqERuLHnQ-sNvc/
3367460
2090029
Re: [tsvwg] Remaining issues for draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-22 - TimestampsRe: [tsvwg] Remaining issues for draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-22 - Timestamps
C. M. Heard
2023-06-26
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/L3bMPypssqFNIvLZGvwkWnY82Wg/
3321553
2069391
Re: [Gendispatch] Making all RFCs UTF-8, with questions about RFC 20Re: [Gendispatch] Making all RFCs UTF-8, with questions about RFC 20
John Levine
2023-03-13
gendispatch
None
/arch/msg/gendispatch/dG6xgQHk4cfqQP8OKS1kO6Slayo/
3286986
2055818
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9327 <draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9327 <draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-11> for your review
Brian Haberman
2022-10-25
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/WqUe9KDWidaN1Y-eomsD2r5gwig/
3240929
2035736
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9327 <draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9327 <draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-11> for your review
Megan Ferguson
2022-10-25
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/XTNCjfF7c_s7-D3jv_D2pC4QuWs/
3240879
2035736
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9327 <draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9327 <draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-11> for your review
Brian Haberman
2022-10-22
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/xeeztptYSu2kS1HJFhgH_vMGoCE/
3239008
2035736
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9327 <draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-11> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9327 <draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-11> for your review
rfc-editor
2022-10-22
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/VbMiox31M2QGnEWbm4Yy2eVtqDA/
3238805
2035736
Re: [Ntp] NTPv5 Loop Detection without Stratum - Why do we want this?Re: [Ntp] NTPv5 Loop Detection without Stratum - Why do we want this?
Miroslav Lichvar
2022-09-06
ntp
None
/arch/msg/ntp/c21keeel6V3Xw5MvIC1GoWsxgxs/
3219270
2025935
Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Re: [EXT] Re: I‑D Action: draft‑ietf‑ntp‑ntpv5‑requirements‑00.txtRe: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Re: [EXT] Re: I‑D Action: draft‑ietf‑ntp‑ntpv5‑requirements‑00.txt
Ulrich Windl
2022-08-23
ntp
None
/arch/msg/ntp/K_13mTUIN7r8u4Oq6ciXxD8sIQ4/
3214565
2022336
Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registriesRe: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries
Harlan Stenn
2022-08-18
ntp
None
/arch/msg/ntp/17qXEYmYuxyrYZi20RvXmVARZmg/
3212958
2023263
[Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries[Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries
Ulrich Windl
2022-08-18
ntp
None
/arch/msg/ntp/ieuUnw7aLDbvJrJ5B0mKYnsABj4/
3212920
2023263
Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registriesRe: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries
Harlan Stenn
2022-08-17
ntp
None
/arch/msg/ntp/O6I90EN0ZQqtAB8Ojc_lFWkR1CM/
3212800
2023263
Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registriesRe: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries
Miroslav Lichvar
2022-08-17
ntp
None
/arch/msg/ntp/218lAIf9AxlLnO4tqCpiEl7DT2A/
3212544
2023263
[Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries[Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries
Ulrich Windl
2022-08-17
ntp
None
/arch/msg/ntp/Rm8d3Nrmv3MR8dzVAWkBrHERu1g/
3212471
2023263
Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registriesRe: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries
Harlan Stenn
2022-08-16
ntp
None
/arch/msg/ntp/M7cEtp4yKAZIGMIEsdr5p6Glb0c/
3212128
2023263
Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registriesRe: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries
Miroslav Lichvar
2022-08-16
ntp
None
/arch/msg/ntp/1lsIFoK9vW6pj9v_ZrXTF9WOlFE/
3212118
2023263
Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft‑ietf‑ntp‑update‑registriesRe: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft‑ietf‑ntp‑update‑registries
Harlan Stenn
2022-08-09
ntp
None
/arch/msg/ntp/M3xjC5H-0Q7w_bpKvqCWn_33G78/
3209940
2023263
Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft‑ietf‑ntp‑update‑registriesRe: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft‑ietf‑ntp‑update‑registries
Miroslav Lichvar
2022-08-09
ntp
None
/arch/msg/ntp/tPk9Lo_alaLHrGHrPLBwSqrRRlM/
3209928
2023263
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9249 <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-17> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9249 <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-17> for your review
Megan Ferguson
2022-06-28
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/xddw5o4llX5LVggv_p5nJA77L2k/
3193650
2015577
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9249 <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-17> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9249 <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-17> for your review
Megan Ferguson
2022-06-28
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/9yAv4-Ygs-BoJldZx3WqZYtZ6pg/
3193647
2015577
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9249 <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-17> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9249 <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-17> for your review
Dhruv Dhody
2022-06-26
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/nH8neQuD7hH1WZJyPoYQL2rv0qI/
3192807
2015577
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9249 <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-17> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9249 <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-17> for your review
Erik Kline
2022-06-25
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/sScHBd9wt-KpI6af4KWuCdkzXpc/
3192744
2015577
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9249 <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-17> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9249 <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-17> for your review
Dhruv Dhody
2022-06-25
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/XEtH5srSs6m9LhdU5sDrnq9oYD4/
3192630
2015577
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9249 <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-17> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9249 <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-17> for your review
Megan Ferguson
2022-06-24
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/CZqGE1fGfCcVHQ0L3LyioH6_R9g/
3192548
2015577
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9249 <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-17> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9249 <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-17> for your review
Dhruv Dhody
2022-06-22
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/gVRykZChM85Drj7N1K3UOrZYY6w/
3191614
2015577
Re: [Ntp] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: (with COMMENT)Re: [Ntp] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw
2020-08-26
ntp
None
/arch/msg/ntp/oCNgVy-9MwlUyXG3ASOyKYSp9DQ/
2923806
1910644
Re: [Ntp] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: (with COMMENT)Re: [Ntp] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: (with COMMENT)
Brian Haberman
2020-08-26
ntp
None
/arch/msg/ntp/xqmO0cdraECunpOWc1PTTvXknUg/
2923797
1910644
[Ntp] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: (with COMMENT)[Ntp] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
2020-08-25
ntp
None
/arch/msg/ntp/mkPdCZLhgwnvS0Yf7_b6WQ2I-Jk/
2923429
1910644
Re: [lamps] [Anima] on certification authorities.Re: [lamps] [Anima] on certification authorities.
Tim Hollebeek
2020-07-08
spasm
None
/arch/msg/spasm/zLMYjjQuwlvTPGq2lPyDOpnVEXQ/
2900994
1901208
Re: [lamps] [Anima] on certification authorities. (fwd) Carsten Bormann: Re: [Anima] on certification authorities.Re: [lamps] [Anima] on certification authorities. (fwd) Carsten Bormann: Re: [Anima] on certification authorities.
Michael Richardson
2020-06-28
spasm
None
/arch/msg/spasm/jNxnpX06M-QWAs4iWQtJjVncuPA/
2896488
1901359
Re: [lamps] [Anima] on certification authorities.Re: [lamps] [Anima] on certification authorities.
Erik Andersen
2020-06-28
spasm
None
/arch/msg/spasm/0MkJZ5N2rJP2VvndRQWhxfHPa-E/
2896446
1901208