Re: [Raw] FW: How do tracks differ from TE protection paths? was: Some comments/questions on RAW ArchitectureRe: [Raw] FW: How do tracks differ from TE protection paths? was: Some comments/questions on RAW Architecture
Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
2022-10-23
raw
None
/arch/msg/raw/xon0cUDUaQkPU0wSjjxBiMJf7PA/
3239137
2008984
Re: [Raw] FW: How do tracks differ from TE protection paths? was: Some comments/questions on RAW ArchitectureRe: [Raw] FW: How do tracks differ from TE protection paths? was: Some comments/questions on RAW Architecture
Lou Berger
2022-10-22
raw
None
/arch/msg/raw/fAKdOlr0l0Otqz-My0fmVMc4yr4/
3238942
2008984
Re: [Raw] FW: How do tracks differ from TE protection paths? was: Some comments/questions on RAW ArchitectureRe: [Raw] FW: How do tracks differ from TE protection paths? was: Some comments/questions on RAW Architecture
Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
2022-10-19
raw
None
/arch/msg/raw/EAfksf-NWQN-J8T94WIuZTKwkOY/
3237057
2008984
Re: [Raw] FW: How do tracks differ from TE protection paths? was: Some comments/questions on RAW ArchitectureRe: [Raw] FW: How do tracks differ from TE protection paths? was: Some comments/questions on RAW Architecture
Lou Berger
2022-09-23
raw
None
/arch/msg/raw/6MgJTOGwRCUZbW1gTqIrBV3mlw0/
3226208
2008984
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2022-08-09
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/o0UivoQGEGX1P7JSMEwvpR0Xdek/
3210140
2020743
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review
Italo Busi
2022-08-09
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/rilrJkzZsZOsXpsJe166Y7CxZlQ/
3209910
2020743
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review
박춘걸(AI Managed Service Projec)
2022-08-08
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/3rS1PUtDcLNxPZXZ1RGGnlMVqu0/
3209798
2020743
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2022-08-08
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/sno9c5BSZ1JT-7YufeO-3hwdfm0/
3209652
2020743
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review
byyun
2022-08-08
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/4ixn6PXIlzw6spzuKz-_9xzkUC8/
3209573
2020743
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review
Hejia (Jia)
2022-08-08
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/NRb5OiTo2JxGoepj7pEpl0KeTj4/
3209567
2020743
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2022-08-05
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/rFfHmG9bXTrtgCv1Z2T-CGzeuF0/
3209101
2020743
Re: [auth48] *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your reviewRe: [auth48] *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2022-07-19
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/efYHwRYJ-ekh_Ix1iQiFeACSJp4/
3202301
2020743
Re: [auth48] *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your reviewRe: [auth48] *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review
Jeong-dong Ryoo
2022-07-19
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/oefU_vg6P8S7sgB3anLFxoO-8ZE/
3201884
2020743
[auth48] *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review[auth48] *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2022-07-16
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/HgV299wGj4lLA9jRo2tgbGiqBZ0/
3201113
2020743
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review
Jeong-dong Ryoo
2022-07-15
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/uYaE2oL2-LNlL6emsSgll4jMV6I/
3200776
2020743
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9270 <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-12> for your review
rfc-editor
2022-07-12
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/FEMMbX8ZUgZbZFcHbXDN2TuDyds/
3199788
2020743
Re: [Teas] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-11: (with COMMENT)Re: [Teas] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-11: (with COMMENT)
Jeong-dong Ryoo
2022-04-19
teas
None
/arch/msg/teas/JaXG1BO1-7G1em7Wf9tLYXHCjHg/
3171805
2006487
Re: [Teas] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-11: (with COMMENT)Re: [Teas] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-11: (with COMMENT)
Jeong-dong Ryoo
2022-04-19
teas
None
/arch/msg/teas/AHyIy2i611g_ueBp_5LKjhwfN4Q/
3171804
2006924
[Teas] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-11: (with COMMENT)[Teas] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-11: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
2022-04-06
teas
None
/arch/msg/teas/i_jfF4aG97b0y7wx4YUk2r2WsIY/
3168154
2006924
Re: [Teas] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10Re: [Teas] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10
Lars Eggert
2022-04-05
teas
None
/arch/msg/teas/AwxUQrS_SDNfoaKisIxkUros9cw/
3167499
1989615
Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10
Lars Eggert
2022-04-05
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/UGLwK6X_v_FMOys2nNWz7K_0_yI/
3167500
1989614
Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10
Lars Eggert
2022-04-05
gen-art
None
/arch/msg/gen-art/aeKqwINnjYo2SfrqF7LvmCpth9k/
3167501
1989613
Re: [Teas] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10Re: [Teas] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10
Jeong-dong Ryoo
2022-02-09
teas
None
/arch/msg/teas/6_YBs35Xy54542oyp7KLYXvY8iM/
3118922
1989615
Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10
Jeong-dong Ryoo
2022-02-09
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/N4Sbay_iX1re3NVRtl5_QRJY7Fg/
3118919
1989614
Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10
Jeong-dong Ryoo
2022-02-09
gen-art
None
/arch/msg/gen-art/YeIy5vLs2zZSqRXPs8Hn6QUEcro/
3118920
1989613
[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10
Dale Worley via Datatracker
2022-02-03
gen-art
None
/arch/msg/gen-art/sVz7p-OqBMRBhxHaqKo9667CRd8/
3116978
1989613
[Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10[Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10
Dale Worley via Datatracker
2022-02-03
last-call
None
/arch/msg/last-call/QTwjrKxeNGBTIkobcQDpnmJWX_Y/
3116979
1989614
[Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10[Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-10
Dale Worley via Datatracker
2022-02-03
teas
None
/arch/msg/teas/m6C09fNbtEnaRemvSP_iSkQdVI4/
3116980
1989615
Re: [Teas] AD review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-08Re: [Teas] AD review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-08
Jeong-dong Ryoo
2022-01-17
teas
None
/arch/msg/teas/r48oTqQSAID0zMIP0y2HfaZjB3E/
3111090
1986088
Re: [Teas] AD review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-08Re: [Teas] AD review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-08
John Scudder
2022-01-14
teas
None
/arch/msg/teas/jAelewsuSnF1e7HcoeKungQPKBg/
3110699
1986088
Re: [Teas] AD review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-08Re: [Teas] AD review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-08
Jeong-dong Ryoo
2022-01-14
teas
None
/arch/msg/teas/_RIRU0GYG5O08irogxEFMXQLUQI/
3110551
1986088
Re: [Teas] AD review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-08Re: [Teas] AD review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-08
Jeong-dong Ryoo
2022-01-10
teas
None
/arch/msg/teas/mumu8pX5kWivHIqUCHtxjjskkrU/
3109291
1986088
Re: [Teas] AD review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-08Re: [Teas] AD review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-08
Adrian Farrel
2022-01-09
teas
None
/arch/msg/teas/qpRsg6UdxzrEiRtzUTIaLrczJIY/
3109254
1986088
[Teas] AD review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-08[Teas] AD review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-08
John Scudder
2022-01-06
teas
None
/arch/msg/teas/BpQM1GfMNL6DPbBOvCoaPJgepGc/
3108738
1986088
Re: [Detnet] [spring] 答复: SR and DetNet, draft on sr-redundancy-protectionRe: [Detnet] [spring] 答复: SR and DetNet, draft on sr-redundancy-protection
Balázs Varga A
2021-07-22
detnet
None
/arch/msg/detnet/-ngNwHsVaaIpVbpr050q8XH-Rok/
3055719
1958289
Re: [spring] 答复: SR and DetNet, draft on sr-redundancy-protectionRe: [spring] 答复: SR and DetNet, draft on sr-redundancy-protection
Balázs Varga A
2021-07-22
spring
None
/arch/msg/spring/1zuIyepm8qeEf-x8GqIad1EHXeo/
3055720
1958290
Re: [Detnet] [spring] 答复: SR and DetNet, draft on sr-redundancy-protectionRe: [Detnet] [spring] 答复: SR and DetNet, draft on sr-redundancy-protection
Gyan Mishra
2021-07-06
detnet
None
/arch/msg/detnet/8IrsA03Wq_zqZwwHQ5IsX63rgRs/
3050167
1958289
Re: [spring] 答复: SR and DetNet, draft on sr-redundancy-protectionRe: [spring] 答复: SR and DetNet, draft on sr-redundancy-protection
Gyan Mishra
2021-07-06
spring
None
/arch/msg/spring/UU5ABcU0U65QWllJmlxTo-l7AV4/
3050168
1958290
Re: [Detnet] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04: (with COMMENT)Re: [Detnet] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk
2020-05-03
detnet
None
/arch/msg/detnet/vHDlpCtfIwDohhZdlgbRPzxRINo/
2874041
1891520
Re: [Detnet] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04: (with COMMENT)Re: [Detnet] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04: (with COMMENT)
Balázs Varga A
2020-04-28
detnet
None
/arch/msg/detnet/xP_wdiXJWtdYBeLmRQVhN7QxxGc/
2871948
1891520