Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Justin Uberti
2023-11-11
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/n_Ysy6iFA-EHW_miIfjEwQq_ivM/
3383081
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Murray S. Kucherawy
2023-11-08
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/X0MVq57eiZeUptrvhVYMCuG58no/
3380915
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-10-30
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/o4vqdhns6ghr7VHHqSuheSnXA6o/
3376536
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Cullen Jennings
2023-10-29
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/1vsJ-uvQA_EQWmYOjV60wGrzXLI/
3375548
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Justin Uberti
2023-10-28
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/fEAnnOSW9MW7y1RtJOAgbEUGuwo/
3375416
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Murray S. Kucherawy
2023-10-28
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/y5lYrs3q_1UrVrQseKF8ol52x90/
3375305
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Lynne Bartholomew
2023-10-27
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/zQLVJKcB4wC8sZ8xH40qIRbr968/
3375136
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Justin Uberti
2023-10-17
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/NY-PlGPdULb5OeyVWFHu9j4p5Jg/
3369262
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
Sean Turner
2023-10-17
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/3fMT_ue6dKqzg9Pv47ZV0fDQ8gU/
3369259
2089525
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9429 <draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-05> for your review
rfc-editor
2023-10-10
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/Ei9HWNfzBBuU5mO1Phl3Z07UX7Y/
3366440
2089525
[nfsv4] My probable non-participation in IETF114 meeting -- missing agenda items[nfsv4] My probable non-participation in IETF114 meeting -- missing agenda items
Noveck, David
2022-07-18
nfsv4
None
/arch/msg/nfsv4/aNDxYaW0wN8qfucZN7m44U-ZQ0k/
3201580
2021355
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Lorenzo Miniero
2022-04-04
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/G5gJ_Wu7J7SYPr96CzqGVVcgUUM/
3167009
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Maxim Sharabayko
2022-04-04
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/3chkpNByOS_1__AwvLfdwUuLWVA/
3166993
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Lorenzo Miniero
2022-03-29
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/vDCNirDaFB_0k_ZQjDPhepuVfE8/
3164802
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Maxim Sharabayko
2022-03-28
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/oXHrLGJ74bIW_QFxL0E_kYVjUr8/
3164418
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Simon Pietro Romano
2022-03-23
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/kcxVnYJR_rm6C92P4Rl3wfMexbQ/
3162327
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Maxim Sharabayko
2022-03-23
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/J6aHr2E9ZHmcyhwyL3rszAgcxM4/
3162302
2004575
Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?Re: [Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Justin Uberti
2022-03-23
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/KpKANpdrNHh8_1VrRJ3WfnSVr7g/
3162100
2004575
[Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?[Moq] How complicated is WebRTC?
Cullen Jennings
2022-03-22
moq
None
/arch/msg/moq/S7ww0KiL0fRFN04h2AQQ6yjJjfw/
3162012
2004575
Re: [Masque] Can H3 DATAGRAMs be more self-describing?Re: [Masque] Can H3 DATAGRAMs be more self-describing?
Tommy Pauly
2021-03-13
masque
None
/arch/msg/masque/0jK9E9ZeZGjFPF_oJEZv8DJs24o/
3009792
1943338
Re: [Wish] WHIP should also allow *media* to be sent over the HTTPS connectionRe: [Wish] WHIP should also allow *media* to be sent over the HTTPS connection
Alexandre GOUAILLARD
2021-03-13
wish
None
/arch/msg/wish/ZJYkZvyIaKd069YaWw02j4mQ5Kc/
3009732
1943999
Re: [Masque] Can H3 DATAGRAMs be more self-describing?Re: [Masque] Can H3 DATAGRAMs be more self-describing?
Lucas Pardue
2021-03-13
masque
None
/arch/msg/masque/4bpE_w3onCUelPPFMgtJ2fZ2xuY/
3009715
1943338
Re: [Masque] Can H3 DATAGRAMs be more self-describing?Re: [Masque] Can H3 DATAGRAMs be more self-describing?
Luke Curley
2021-03-13
masque
None
/arch/msg/masque/RxuJQCKOtnELZcOCoZ0DBb-jAyY/
3009709
1943338
Re: [Hipsec] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-28: (with COMMENT)Re: [Hipsec] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-28: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk
2020-02-25
hipsec
None
/arch/msg/hipsec/iP_of3P2RfxJIbeVDz2qGonO8nY/
2839878
1784194
Re: [Hipsec] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-28: (with COMMENT)Re: [Hipsec] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-28: (with COMMENT)
Miika Komu
2020-02-18
hipsec
None
/arch/msg/hipsec/99ZKa9UZHTBYSpR01exrhfPekC0/
2836913
1784194
Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-49: (with COMMENT)Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-49: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk
2018-04-16
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/DGt4LXGdbQnwC0YEnVCC0Qlqx3U/
2572610
1780750
Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-49: (with COMMENT)Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-49: (with COMMENT)
Christer Holmberg
2018-04-14
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/kfd1X0wzJrgRkbNN737oxVKOE8A/
2572048
1780750
Re: TSV-ART Last Call review for draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sipRe: TSV-ART Last Call review for draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip
Joerg Ott
2018-02-02
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/DUOjL4CI8UPp8xfKC0GazzOn42g/
2537019
1766164
Re: [Tsv-art] TSV-ART Last Call review for draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sipRe: [Tsv-art] TSV-ART Last Call review for draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip
Joerg Ott
2018-02-02
tsv-art
None
/arch/msg/tsv-art/dDHnJ65V8LAklmSJbsQi0UDyRlU/
2537020
1766163
[MMUSIC] Fwd: Re: TSV-ART Last Call review for draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip[MMUSIC] Fwd: Re: TSV-ART Last Call review for draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip
Thomas Stach
2018-02-01
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/2Qg2bNovWumMAU0a6exF9qTVAEc/
2536748
1767185
Re: [Tsv-art] TSV-ART Last Call review for draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sipRe: [Tsv-art] TSV-ART Last Call review for draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip
Thomas Stach
2018-02-01
tsv-art
None
/arch/msg/tsv-art/TeUdOb3abu_CAhgP7oaiJXwBJJU/
2536744
1766163
Re: TSV-ART Last Call review for draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sipRe: TSV-ART Last Call review for draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip
Thomas Stach
2018-02-01
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/hakdS04N2PqqTg4UEh15F0cFpWg/
2536745
1766164
[Tsv-art] TSV-ART Last Call review for draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip[Tsv-art] TSV-ART Last Call review for draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip
Joerg Ott
2018-01-26
tsv-art
None
/arch/msg/tsv-art/rUrheaRgbBIZXJF8RvuQbpZHj2w/
2534155
1766163
TSV-ART Last Call review for draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sipTSV-ART Last Call review for draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip
Joerg Ott
2018-01-26
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/KJ1JJ7Er5wFGdMtABiLYjcTunYI/
2534156
1766164
Re: [rtcweb] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18: (with COMMENT)Re: [rtcweb] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18: (with COMMENT)
Sean Turner
2017-05-16
rtcweb
None
/arch/msg/rtcweb/4-TYKft_3pNElIAVVHYYk3S4xM4/
2392922
1700760
Re: [MMUSIC] RFC 5761 updated by both draft-mux-exclusive and RFC 8035Re: [MMUSIC] RFC 5761 updated by both draft-mux-exclusive and RFC 8035
Asveren, Tolga
2017-05-08
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/smy64HgwXL5OZeTXBnnOuEC4sb8/
2389101
1701063
Re: [MMUSIC] draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive-11 / always bidirectional?Re: [MMUSIC] draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive-11 / always bidirectional?
Asveren, Tolga
2017-05-08
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/yIYBaUcc-rtXx_S0QzRgBY_8qmk/
2389100
1700254
Re: [MMUSIC] RFC 5761 updated by both draft-mux-exclusive and RFC 8035Re: [MMUSIC] RFC 5761 updated by both draft-mux-exclusive and RFC 8035
Christer Holmberg
2017-05-05
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/8Jkcd_E7cc1tdtuRDoWfNe4Xnbs/
2388608
1701063
Re: [MMUSIC] RFC 5761 updated by both draft-mux-exclusive and RFC 8035Re: [MMUSIC] RFC 5761 updated by both draft-mux-exclusive and RFC 8035
Flemming Andreasen
2017-05-05
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/SyG1thu59wBDdMpfxc587oX4L04/
2388590
1701063
Re: [MMUSIC] RFC 5761 updated by both draft-mux-exclusive and RFC 8035Re: [MMUSIC] RFC 5761 updated by both draft-mux-exclusive and RFC 8035
Christer Holmberg
2017-05-04
mmusic
None
/arch/msg/mmusic/skChfXFszLnBCzgdIMxaMHSBy28/
2388027
1701063