IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Fri, 07 November 2014 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF511A1B26 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:59:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sF83ChhNUR52 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:59:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com [209.85.220.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6FDD1A0451 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:59:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id lf10so4241459pab.33 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:59:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=ri0mXPqyxWkAveNUODDKSI0efGL6le32/MKR8nBK7eA=; b=cN4eiOG3mCTRXru1rhKuVuftPu1hiP5akzTYbyopTY6stKifMZYRDJ8QdH7ivn8uml K3pROphvHT8moXNT2jFKdcWxhUOSUCc2DN2rgU2rHP5uxKXerPS6lgPZkdYMcD9fqQyW HXAu5iDXniRd7yiwc0t2ElcvULRZcva2MOOn8fdAnR4uWdlQ6lwioFF+8YZMUxXpqHYx Rv5eh13xGOk9SN66lE6VCqmNi1gXKEOnJqTOfIFsyPfxt2pjpr5ih9bsNYchEWo6ZTgk FOFRxxP/ZIvGNR2rX2dQ3HMa/6SKeEoOlfXRgET3FofGU2iJ82E+PMVEsZlHG+WBNhzP 4Q1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQntGJtF6xBMKd3T1jtUXX9VaP/vEOZ8s/hu08jGjYC5C5UJ24BfJOjljURB8oxUANcH+Yie
X-Received: by 10.68.98.99 with SMTP id eh3mr15075935pbb.64.1415393982586; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:59:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2605:e000:1102:4026:4599:84cc:4f94:a316? ([2605:e000:1102:4026:4599:84cc:4f94:a316]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vo10sm9668247pab.19.2014.11.07.12.59.40 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:59:41 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C20CE321-37E7-4BC5-84CA-6CFF62CF3BE8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <545B9F8A.6090502@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:59:37 -1000
Message-Id: <FB588096-E8EF-4D2D-A504-3B6AE2D591BB@virtualized.org>
References: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNIEOJCNAA.rhill@hill-a.ch> <54594A50.4090305@meetinghouse.net> <20141105001731.GA30186@mx1.yitter.info> <54597BDB.7040305@meetinghouse.net> <5459BA98.1070006@gmail.com> <545A208A.7040304@meetinghouse.net> <631e3e3d29c843bd9c23151c63612989@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105154903.GI30379@mx1.yitter.info> <498a39b81b774192bd2d609b3feab35f@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105234444.GM31320@crankycanuck.ca> <545ABCB0.5080206@meetinghouse.net> <8f3dcda6c3db4cd8be1b77444f987d59@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <D0805C27.136BE7%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <7F52A930-DD6F-4D0D-8278-A021CF8A466C@istaff.org> <D080D78C.136C6E%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <545B9F8A.6090502@meetinghouse.net>
To: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/4Q3onpUPXYhvSAQa3mQ9VChBG-4
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 20:59:44 -0000

Miles,

On Nov 6, 2014, at 6:19 AM, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> wrote:
> More specifically, I'm concerned with avoiding any confusion or operational disruption in the event of future conflicts among the parties involved in oversight, management, and/or performance of the IANA functions - particularly in the case where a transition of contractor might occur on less then friendly terms.
> 
> Under such situations, it seems at least possible, if not likely, that litigation might ensue and/or that parties might operate competing registries - causing operational confusion at a minimum, and possibly more serious disruptions to smooth operation of the net.

We're talking about the protocol parameter registries, right?

I'm honestly curious: could you describe the "serious disruptions to smooth operation of the net" or "operational confusion" that would occur in the event of future conflicts relating to the IANA trademark and/or IANA.ORG domain?

Thanks,
-drc
(ICANN CTO, but speaking only for myself. Really.)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email