IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 03 November 2014 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59171A6FB1 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:09:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.758
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.758 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nz8cugOMS6oC for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:09:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D32E61A6F97 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (nat-07-mht.dyndns.com [216.146.45.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23FD78A035 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 18:09:26 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 13:09:24 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20141103180924.GM27751@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <D07CEABF.1357FC%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNCEMLCNAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNCEMLCNAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/spWwyPntWmib-KXVceOdTFrA7FU
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 18:09:43 -0000

On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 06:23:28PM +0100, Richard Hill wrote:
> then I suggest that we develop language to the effect that the intellectual
> property rights and the domain name IANA.ORG will be transferred to the ISOC
> Trust (or whatever part of ISOC is the appropriate entity to receive it).

I think that idea is completely unworkable, and I strongly oppose
adding such language to the draft.

> In my view, the mark, and the domain name, belong to ISOC morally, if not
> legally and

Certainly not legally, and I don't understand the "moral" argument
either.  ISOC has never itself performed the IANA function.  Why does
ISOC have a better claim than the organization that has been providing
the service for more than 10 years?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email