Re: [Ianaplan] draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Alissa's point goes a little beyond my comment on the same
text, but having read this, I share her concerns.

S

On 01/11/14 00:11, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> I’d like to pick up on one comment I made in my last review of the
> document that did not get sufficiently addressed. It concerns this
> text:
> 
> "To address concerns regarding appropriate contingencies to
> transition to another operator, the IAOC is asked to conclude a
> supplemental agreement that- ...
> 
> 2.  requires the transfer of any associated marks and identifiers to 
> subsequent operators."
> 
> My problem with this is that one mark cannot be transferred to two
> operators. So if we end up in a situation where there are multiple
> IANA operators for different registries, how will it be decided who
> gets the existing marks? If I were the current owner of such marks, I
> don’t see how I could agree to this provision without foreclosing the
> possibility that there may be multiple simultaneous operators in the
> future. This is why I think this requirement should be stated as
> requiring “cooperation with subsequent operators to minimize
> confusion" associated with marks and identifiers, or some similar
> language that provides a safeguard in the event of transition but
> does not mandate specific transfer actions related to marks and
> identifiers.
> 
> I also still find it quite problematic that this section requires the
> IAOC to conclude supplemental agreements, instead of maintaining the
> existing relationship that the IETF has with the IAOC wherein it is
> the IAOC’s responsibility to determine the format in which is carries
> out its responsibilities on behalf of the IETF.
> 
> Alissa
> 
> On Oct 28, 2014, at 7:42 AM, Marc Blanchet
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> Hello, given the proposed timeline agreed during our last interim
>> meeting and based on that the outstanding issues should have been
>> addressed in the -02 version, this message starts a working group
>> last call on draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02.  This working
>> group last call will end november 11, 23h59 UTC. Given that our
>> meeting is scheduled on november 10th, it would be useful if people
>> send their comments prior to the meeting so they can be addressed
>> or discussed before or during the meeting.
>> 
>> Draft:
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02.txt
>> 
>> Please send comments to the list.
>> 
>> Regards, Marc&Leslie, co-chairs. 
>> _______________________________________________ Ianaplan mailing
>> list [e-mail] 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
> 
> _______________________________________________ Ianaplan mailing
> list [e-mail] 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>