Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ZqHfjSGLzaiypo7ZPjkXM2mC8IA/
2821263
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
John C Klensin
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ZYhXV3RCEQiglOcWkiubZi0U6k0/
2821260
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/dmX1OLk7kaDQPzfjhkc8JDurNA4/
2821249
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/xaicB-8qBo10TSYEAgBCLge31fM/
2821228
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Ooa_4XYNA4G0iPnrY5KXlrtisHo/
2821222
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/3891M-xmKC8XOTGgyahG4-nK7k0/
2821221
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Kb23Ntk-FgnkviYXMEqdjvAec3w/
2821207
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/A7kx_UNO6_j5Rc0MxNwBMYsCsKs/
2821204
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/oLXxNr_TL-etaZUHBLAUsEcAJww/
2821203
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Jg-L4yBIVZyTwLEIWdQeE0Kv34g/
2821201
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/eH-i4APbOCd0BbGYWmDsXh72yQw/
2821198
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Arnt Gulbrandsen
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/hsIrKCqPFRpGRKpRHw5W7v6lLLQ/
2821197
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/LPSGkCAHIhp8G5QPIF5nSoO_Dgs/
2821196
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/FuxC-6Jak8ivH-Pf8Ecpj6zRdws/
2821194
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/wABe_iWtG_uFafgTCk-QguyMs0k/
2821188
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/88FXo2aNIlySqJDcEovvF_f0MVg/
2821176
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
John C Klensin
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/XCzgAp6Ny0m4PWQcFt3boayUB5E/
2821173
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/CVI5XX1mvAV_ABE_VYjaJPJEtGQ/
2821167
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/QRKePVJ-9YdFrr8uAZeP94mNTww/
2821166
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Hector Santos
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/N45mdZkPHXdEhd3FwNGf8CS1XbQ/
2821161
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/mEQLq5DfmpH3Vg6LXbmtvnTaM_w/
2821156
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/AQ8raPof13w7ZhdHbHpobBI5aMc/
2821154
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
John R Levine
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/y6TOIBVk_WCUdGw7P9QKhMSqO6c/
2821149
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Hector Santos
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/GgAcIn_Ik8pIaLW-dN7eFK2omw4/
2821143
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Hector Santos
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/KK0GtDVFNRp5hnZpvel0tOwIGZY/
2821129
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Vx-gU8c4yaVrW2eWTvDn32acqRc/
2821118
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Hector Santos
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/VTmQJ80XcnCFI7ieuW2w0c_649M/
2821117
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Hector Santos
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/zsx61SIpbh9gXlKDZq-uyWi9YI4/
2821102
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Alessandro Vesely
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/d7iI6H0sUpiG-Kkx6rs4lhhrdaw/
2821075
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Viktor Dukhovni
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/nfgZmw--G8IQWtrAUrwdPzUCL60/
2821054
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Keith Moore
2020-01-01
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/w8hU-RG4ewc2eRihp_JBodzMr4Q/
2821020
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
John Levine
2020-01-01
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/wQKyeTsBQNo1ZgY1ZZAzuENa9EQ/
2821018
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Keith Moore
2020-01-01
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/tcs97a3nS2y-PWhowDl2Kb5PLTU/
2821011
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-01
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/GkNaTJZKwJc8Q2Cm1z0qRsnIrxY/
2821005
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Keith Moore
2020-01-01
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Ceb4oXs2AFVRpjuBrnAbeBVkh6w/
2821003
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
John Levine
2020-01-01
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/zK0-L2kNaosTytxbJjuiNG5TfbI/
2821001
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Keith Moore
2020-01-01
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ntILVaFzeBCAhDqpzUXXDwLDWpY/
2820998
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Viktor Dukhovni
2020-01-01
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/yd3gkpoGOdS37wlirsC3mLG_Ih0/
2820997
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
John R Levine
2020-01-01
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/LeTnRdnxFDuv0FdGvBkN_ltmBkg/
2820996
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-01
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ksp2Vz4v9rZKWM1LMjuTsQVxRJk/
2820995
1872373