Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-03-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/D-MGYbggrmfNHxiRnzStmIAPZCE/
1924023
1339649
IETF 93 - Registration is Now Open!IETF 93 - Registration is Now Open!
IETF Secretariat
2015-03-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/JQ0QGvEkrkNXpSr74NOpGIeakYo/
1923988
1339648
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Larry Masinter
2015-03-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/g7qqcOa9HaX9PpN1uDYqjt9p9Gc/
1923761
1339649
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Dave Cridland
2015-03-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/pHx-OQljtLPqlPjRb4xbS2rjQ30/
1923545
1339649
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
t.p.
2015-03-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/x1aIOtGCtdgxLCih-G9-cE4UkqM/
1923529
1339649
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.orgWeekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Thomas Narten
2015-03-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/WdeCV0eIA0U-O9U1EHD0T_VgTgs/
1923434
1338915
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-03-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/UPtewm_YIqexrdm7c7r2PsYQ7ls/
1923404
1339649
Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Kathleen Moriarty
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/K4nU8liF6y-AOw0Qodu0_NW7qbY/
1923257
1339651
Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Spencer Dawkins at IETF
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/VEupDRZMcGl8AjfS0ztiTYLWS4o/
1923255
1339651
Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Black, David
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/061kYh12pVr8G45y2RAoKqVkEKI/
1923235
1339651
Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: [eX-bulk] : Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/MErdD3hcPtXNuWPACYSpndTP1k8/
1924800
1339652
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Dave Cridland
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/yTGXU_7ejDQgkRFMYirk82d_-is/
1923169
1339649
Re: Confidentiality (was - Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal)Re: Confidentiality (was - Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal)
Mary Barnes
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/sTidkvZ0yipXrmD8HXNcqRe7NAw/
1923168
1339652
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Fred Baker (fred)
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/2iVhm1Xkwt_10VxPwElzyJ-YwaI/
1923134
1339652
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Fred Baker (fred)
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/ErYOM5X-Npmki9zHkmXc-rGfRd8/
1923116
1339652
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Michael Richardson
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/L1IoJsDaE9vTzHEl9J4COE8wcWA/
1923061
1339652
Re: Generalist ADs?Re: Generalist ADs?
Abdussalam Baryun
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/kBiF51SYTX9ERSIQw-XqMfWLlgk/
1923004
1339650
Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Alia Atlas
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Nzzjmhbd_Bmy5SF8HtilawNwE8M/
1922974
1339651
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/nd5JI6hkpo9lQTu4RMv6xmQqRIY/
1922953
1339649
Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Brian E Carpenter
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/O4T89_p1oTQ8kGk4xW5u7PJqp-M/
1922940
1339651
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Lee Howard
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Kr7QZxWYSId8YkWRWx6nbv8Yod0/
1922908
1339652
DNSSEC change on IETF web pagesDNSSEC change on IETF web pages
IETF Chair
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Aofk3Dw4dOejMnFd21URbFP-gx0/
1922904
1339701
Re: We should drop the useless urn: prefixRe: We should drop the useless urn: prefix
Michael Richardson
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/WC_yWzIiI2flBnwARfbI-18ykmA/
1922823
1339649
Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/BLFXbr7Bm83XkQABD73w0LO8Yvo/
1922777
1339651
Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Ted Lemon
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/YpKliKml9TvUO7jWnxnlD-jsluo/
1922758
1339651
RE: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?RE: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Black, David
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/rWf-WsC2torS2oW5y3f7M6ZOzw8/
1922729
1339651
RE: Generalist ADs?RE: Generalist ADs?
Black, David
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/IuM3SC-hZC6kDozWv3_97G_Kb4I/
1922717
1339650
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
t.p.
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/umQDqaJ4nVO2vvgGCVjN3Bkrd-Q/
1922690
1339652
Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?Re: "Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Melinda Shore
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/cSzgh2RdoAvz8BPET2N0noj4OD8/
1922643
1339651
We should drop the useless urn: prefixWe should drop the useless urn: prefix
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/FMT3heO7fRNQILzIU_65oap__nk/
1922633
1339649
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Ted Lemon
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/83nP98WbO01-BjifjDHTfcFf74U/
1922626
1339652
Generalist ADs?Generalist ADs?
Spencer Dawkins at IETF
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/1HhfrxnQb57o1aqCl_LymHsQ0TE/
1922620
1339650
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Ted Lemon
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/ON3AqPPuERr50T5vxKohk3TKB2A/
1922616
1339652
"Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?"Per Area" and "Per AD" review ballots?
Spencer Dawkins at IETF
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/N_y0CncLMCECaMykAenl6O0T07Q/
1922613
1339651
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Bob Hinden
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Vzy4Jlvl_vhTHkqwMKC6lp5dOGY/
1922586
1339652
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Spencer Dawkins at IETF
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/FqgiYFYAsLtCsdr_f6a3svOH2Nc/
1922561
1339652
Confidentiality (was - Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal)Confidentiality (was - Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal)
Dave Crocker
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/zXxUJdZmWxQctJfivb2vf8BDLtQ/
1922552
1339652
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Kathleen Moriarty
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/_EPYgVssfsR_nYMAATalhSGs8bA/
1922489
1339652
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Michael Richardson
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/HhC1Y2VMWjnmYip80dqfeNZL9B0/
1922484
1339652
Re: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewalRe: Nomcom feedback to appointees not up for renewal
Michael Richardson
2015-03-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/6bGV2hlJTydb_q2bIqoxcFS8H1k/
1922483
1339652