Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)
Steve Linford
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/dw9Jc4Pyb84UE_0DNxzklDZx5E4/
622420
1343693
Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Iljitsch van Beijnum
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/5qV4xjEcjwFZ4iMBzrlpblzR4Xs/
622419
1343692
RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)
michael.dillon
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/DqUsBm2O5DMmoyWSOO2uCfKDWcE/
622418
1343693
Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Rémi Denis-Courmont
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/R9DtBrPkreRxY5NmuW60qPLdHU8/
622417
1343692
Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07
Mark Andrews
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/bDVUSYDfdVSTK6qehpKE0-s9_hc/
622416
1343700
Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07
Mark Andrews
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/pRQFSS0xZqrBDqSdFVCh26o2Hl0/
622415
1343700
Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07
Pekka Savola
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/_KhGcBBvz3I33BHZKrK0ah5yttw/
622414
1343700
Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07
Mark Andrews
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/kZ583ZXOyra_Tx8O24MN4jCCaoo/
622413
1343700
Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07
Pekka Savola
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/2SCFGIhev1pHIe68xUUbq8zi6ts/
622412
1343700
Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)
Doug Otis
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/sCB3ij5E7NW1LV5kg76rEwWjqr4/
622411
1343707
Who Wants an RFID Badge for the Upcoming IETF Conference?Who Wants an RFID Badge for the Upcoming IETF Conference?
Athar Shiraz Siddiqui
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/DGkS7HD7cIvPqZ9vwIUZpxK3zGQ/
622410
1343687
secdir review of draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sdsecdir review of draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd
Kurt Zeilenga
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/CumfX1tsq2o7gzF1LbSAI4kS8N8/
622409
1343688
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Chris Lewis
2008-11-14
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/XMkIhczxDoFkWk1Is2y9lhHOwp8/
622408
1343693
comments on draft-ietf-p2psip-base-00 re enrollmentcomments on draft-ietf-p2psip-base-00 re enrollment
Das, Saumitra
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/SUtoT_eT9NNds23xbrVyhggXp_U/
622407
1343689
Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCPRe: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP
Russ Housley
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/nmeEllciu0o-ngZNRR_Nr4DF1j4/
622406
1343250
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Keith Moore
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/S1BCXXqUuGYzcyzvEZj-pgtvWy0/
622405
1343693
Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Keith Moore
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/uvydziHFoi0cXvYl_hKSS67WTpU/
622404
1343692
RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/2cV6eBp8_u1Q3aU56mPL3Wt5c8k/
622403
1343692
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Peter Dambier
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/m0LVv5U05bbyBnEpCgxHmufeaV0/
622402
1343693
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
David Romerstein
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/PZeMx1-crqaDoyIZIi57XtNgbt8/
622401
1343693
RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/tvRWqG7SNd7Ef1PiXo1hQis0DZI/
622400
1343692
Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Keith Moore
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/zxFdlYkBf622NPXC-1JFH1mTpW4/
622399
1343692
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Peter Dambier
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/g-fYZeF2-zNu6z-m-U82ZKMvp4I/
622398
1343693
Gen-ART LC Review of draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd-05Gen-ART LC Review of draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd-05
Ben Campbell
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/sCUTCqoyWAUTR7o4gPpbSK4UOjs/
622397
1343690
Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07
Mark Andrews
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/CBXQcQj0f6JSgJOn7WZPj2dWx40/
622396
1343700
RE: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, wasseveral messagesRE: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, wasseveral messages
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/053tKwbtIwkvKhIPH0L_b4Dgvi8/
622395
1343693
TSV Area review of draft-ietf-dime-qos-parametersTSV Area review of draft-ietf-dime-qos-parameters
Scott O. Bradner
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/F4HOcedpEcqJz5htz1c2NC-3EUc/
622394
1343691
RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/2sJh5dUSbA780JjapCK9AEqEdrA/
622393
1343708
Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Iljitsch van Beijnum
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Q0DsNn3ktJFzz2YttRQci9btNVc/
622392
1343692
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)
Steve Linford
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/0JirIkVn1G-kwtNyOKmutYZIIuY/
622391
1343693
RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/rJOF_LbyMFZxGEhjeiudjGwpS9k/
622390
1343692
RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/0WJ2a_z5iIGwoYXU_TCC-x4RMnQ/
622389
1343692
Re: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Ted Hardie
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/IYamMlaJqK4nbxqaxtwWb3erySo/
622388
1343693
Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Chris Lewis
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/PVBAG9mdKIyhAPTwPuqstO7pMdQ/
622387
1343708
Clarifying harm to DNS (was: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages_Clarifying harm to DNS (was: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages_
Andrew Sullivan
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/bW_AwJpSczVMMiHp6qJtOhicmhY/
622386
1343693
Context specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesContext specific semantics was Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Ted Hardie
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/4-uDS5Vo-LJfrX9QgyAcj-mFGdY/
622385
1343693
Re: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussionRe: [P2PSIP] P2PSIP diagnostics: PING discussion
Colin Perkins
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/iao7DYfoneHaniRtzliBsL1dACE/
622384
1343696
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Tony Finch
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/FwSnSQiHc_-mEh_by1rYg2xdZtc/
622383
1343693
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Ted Hardie
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/vAmIq4dC77GHibU7E1KM9pFZGqM/
622382
1343693
Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messagesRe: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages
Matthias Leisi
2008-11-13
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/llWZ6jPBqjrfJOA20Umoniuihj4/
622381
1343693