Re: [mpls] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-control-03Re: [mpls] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-control-03
Stewart Bryant
2023-10-31
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/3VU_rjS9ewfw9A9AA7konPh0A2w/
3376858
2078316
[mpls] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-control-03[mpls] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-sfl-control-03
Stig Venaas via Datatracker
2023-08-09
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/T4E0LZFw1LLNOuBjX3qW30Zjkhg/
3341413
2078316
[mpls] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-xiao-mpls-lsp-ping-ioam-conf-state-00.txt[mpls] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-xiao-mpls-lsp-ping-ioam-conf-state-00.txt
xiao.min2
2022-10-21
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/EpefdYw-JptDmE6Ksg8j18p_WWU/
3238267
2035493
Re: [mpls] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [mpls] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk
2021-03-04
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/LJjrxeu2y08rfluHAe7Fan7zszo/
3005640
1941411
Re: [mpls] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)Re: [mpls] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Stewart Bryant
2021-03-04
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/ONuST6PhuE7P7SHjqRSusEGO9Eo/
3005388
1941411
Re: [mpls] mLDP YANG ID rev -05 uploaded [Re: YANG Doctor Early Review for "YANG Data Model for MPLS mLDP" - draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-03]Re: [mpls] mLDP YANG ID rev -05 uploaded [Re: YANG Doctor Early Review for "YANG Data Model for MPLS mLDP" - draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-03]
Acee Lindem (acee)
2018-10-30
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/jU8jD0mU5HVMaMtgk-x1yZ7_8bI/
2652205
1811239
[mpls] mLDP YANG ID rev -05 uploaded [Re: YANG Doctor Early Review for "YANG Data Model for MPLS mLDP" - draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-03][mpls] mLDP YANG ID rev -05 uploaded [Re: YANG Doctor Early Review for "YANG Data Model for MPLS mLDP" - draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-03]
Kamran Raza (skraza)
2018-10-22
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/3LITUTemy7lOuoOuV6vYjDGHvwQ/
2648003
1811239
Re: [mpls] YANG Doctor Early Review for "YANG Data Model for MPLS mLDP" - draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-03Re: [mpls] YANG Doctor Early Review for "YANG Data Model for MPLS mLDP" - draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-03
Kamran Raza (skraza)
2018-06-27
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/loqyfvUQpz_lhJKxq4X-JQImSLk/
2600166
1760470
Re: [mpls] YANG Doctor Early Review for "YANG Data Model for MPLS mLDP" - draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-03Re: [mpls] YANG Doctor Early Review for "YANG Data Model for MPLS mLDP" - draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-03
Kamran Raza (skraza)
2018-03-26
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/zg4YfnT0hQ25wr_XXJd3RCRR8CY/
2563368
1760470
[mpls] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-03[mpls] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-03
Acee Lindem
2017-12-13
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/fqEJvzI6uDKqJlyJKdVygibfqWQ/
2520461
1760488
[mpls] YANG Doctor Early Review for "YANG Data Model for MPLS mLDP" - draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-03[mpls] YANG Doctor Early Review for "YANG Data Model for MPLS mLDP" - draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-yang-03
Acee Lindem (acee)
2017-12-13
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/9eJ4BTsndmJ7KGbrwKvUIW4Mcp8/
2520418
1760470
Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pathsRe: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2017-11-27
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/IA0sIK6QNW6X75r16pwRBnDUfd0/
2513692
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pathsRe: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
2017-11-27
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/auk3YA1UiloGpGgODDG5JCoSeQI/
2513684
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] measurement requirements (was Re: Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths)Re: [mpls] [spring] measurement requirements (was Re: Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths)
Zafar Ali (zali)
2017-11-18
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/d56_RB48_QMpL2FA1auEPT235no/
2511608
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pathsRe: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Martin Horneffer
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/ono61D9-4eThqe8o8Ht_moT4uCw/
2511441
1756681
[mpls] measurement requirements (was Re: [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths)[mpls] measurement requirements (was Re: [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths)
Martin Horneffer
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/z3D9oKMrdT-H1O6rquqefLnOZvQ/
2511438
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pathsRe: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Robert Raszuk
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/_3oJfRp3U46KW76vYoUZE0gWDNs/
2511374
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pathsRe: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Stewart Bryant
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/Jv7qK6dJ3X9gd9hikbaGThzo8cY/
2511314
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pathsRe: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Stewart Bryant
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/2GUhh4l-1FOZLiH0FKlxan6dcYE/
2511208
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pathsRe: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
John E Drake
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/EO75XEfGz9waE6PlmFzrDzNHZWA/
2511149
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pathsRe: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Robert Raszuk
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/1xFqr5o6nPW-AQh1KV4AMqVbciQ/
2511133
1756681
Re: [mpls] Fwd: Re: [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pathsRe: [mpls] Fwd: Re: [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Stewart Bryant
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/BwrT81MSO5qounqOFKsTloV4QwE/
2511131
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pathsRe: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Mach Chen
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/w6UpSDuDIvsnkLVYlamfAQGsZCQ/
2511122
1756681
Re: [mpls] Fwd: Re: [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pathsRe: [mpls] Fwd: Re: [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Robert Raszuk
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/wCWoLtOVtHhB-32H-6D6btjISlE/
2511085
1756681
[mpls] Fwd: Re: [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths[mpls] Fwd: Re: [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Stewart Bryant
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/B4bz2_opVvQszj6Fw-jJHJ6iY9w/
2511070
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?
Greg Mirsky
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/M_J5zXLO2nMxJIIuoXa-td2syMs/
2511064
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pathsRe: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Stewart Bryant
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/A5-vdJOs13nsPPDL0etufpUyGqg/
2511062
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?
Mach Chen
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/S89yHfox5p309JN3me6Z9gU1Zqc/
2511053
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?
Greg Mirsky
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/J7wGHMqVGCcnJRGHhfEGrlP9OD4/
2511021
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?
Alexander Vainshtein
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/3VCvAd9N3RrivybNmLpFdI8dB2s/
2510968
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?
Robert Raszuk
2017-11-17
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/KRXp2UmTa6WOuN4tepVxOKIBFuE/
2510955
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?
John E Drake
2017-11-16
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/06uEtpC7U9uj27i9M8pdJ0uu-kQ/
2510923
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?
John E Drake
2017-11-16
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/T3K-3XreJEhT66XhiBgjgYgLlIE/
2510914
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pathsRe: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Mach Chen
2017-11-16
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/hwioqYcW-5Xqa3yXABDuRl4oEEc/
2510782
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-pathsRe: [mpls] [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths
Mach Chen
2017-11-16
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/V3AaLEce-_s_nLpVU3Pb9t0PvLI/
2510780
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?
Robert Raszuk
2017-11-16
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/wgjZ5gPW3RwcKbv6h_-hQh1GO9k/
2510744
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?
John E Drake
2017-11-16
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/5sYxAmZrw4408d2JZe8zMjGB1b0/
2510719
1756681
Re: [mpls] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?Re: [mpls] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?
John E Drake
2017-11-16
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/Rqh78eFlM7QzUakoKliYjeOn6_o/
2510714
1756681
Re: [mpls] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?Re: [mpls] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?
John E Drake
2017-11-16
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/OgHb97-QWr4xtQe-WPtJvd9BfI0/
2510692
1756681
Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?Re: [mpls] [spring] Whether both E2E and SPME performance measurement for MPLS-SR is needed?
Alexander Vainshtein
2017-11-16
mpls
None
/arch/msg/mpls/UEE9EKqByqNJYCEaOCqLUwOlyig/
2510687
1756681