Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider dynamic hybrid between time-based and packet-based loss detection (#1986)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider dynamic hybrid between time-based and packet-based loss detection (#1986)
janaiyengar
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/gbd8po_q8F5yl-LK9eym7PVMzlM/
2682470
1815039
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spurious RTO detection (#1966)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spurious RTO detection (#1966)
janaiyengar
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/5vhlrgf_o1_dfEb8USM31X4B9xM/
2682469
1813996
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spurious RTO detection (#1966)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spurious RTO detection (#1966)
janaiyengar
2019-01-17
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/s6zxPjp3TDS14mGl5IA4tbbMwVA/
2682468
1813996
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jKqyDExQeZQEk1Zrgi-Pzr7pIkM/
2682394
1822391
[quicwg/base-drafts] b5386c: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md[quicwg/base-drafts] b5386c: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
Martin Thomson
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/x1PhFzgPUs31asxJgg2n8CYI5WE/
2682393
1823175
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow servers to send a preferred address of each address family (#2296)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow servers to send a preferred address of each address family (#2296)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FNE2D3faN6E-ptXRjb5A_TWIhrE/
2682389
1821798
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0myenKghmV8GTxsY8KjWqq77RDE/
2682386
1822391
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3: Push stream description diagram is ambiguous (#2338)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3: Push stream description diagram is ambiguous (#2338)
Mike Bishop
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2U3LXYWGb9_QJyCsWcNs08uMioI/
2682347
1823144
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3: is the recommended size of max bidi streams normative? (#2337)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3: is the recommended size of max bidi streams normative? (#2337)
Mike Bishop
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/_Z8ZpKzjIqL_s2wMizfuACS_s8E/
2682346
1823122
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow servers to send a preferred address of each address family (#2296)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow servers to send a preferred address of each address family (#2296)
David Schinazi
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2svUf3Vgq_lvyRwmOPTqB6FMXSU/
2682325
1821798
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK: instructions and stream description is suboptimal (#2339)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK: instructions and stream description is suboptimal (#2339)
afrind
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/dtD6_j6mCFd0LTsWUY7EoZ3vqsE/
2682308
1823145
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)
Lars Eggert
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hVMihK2rXbCsUPZ8OJbDJY63fmg/
2682295
1821882
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)
MikkelFJ
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bWPUY8-e5q2w85Y0tGC_u9ebPH4/
2682294
1819264
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/_9vNAxRkgxVtLKd7ejeiI0TaRa8/
2682293
1822391
[quicwg/base-drafts] 0d231b: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md[quicwg/base-drafts] 0d231b: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/aXCcGBnydyVGpUNr5lB4-iLHpmY/
2682292
1823154
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss Application-Limited Sending (#1637)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss Application-Limited Sending (#1637)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tURW_E8UiafzSJGVMU-0ESXmi1s/
2682290
1799675
[quicwg/base-drafts] 3fb5df: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md[quicwg/base-drafts] 3fb5df: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0IRIE1l93HXJNN8EuCA7ec_5hjc/
2682289
1823153
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss Application-Limited Sending (#1637)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss Application-Limited Sending (#1637)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ZtbxoSVCLvnDdm8aWLFYmP6SrYE/
2682288
1799675
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Q8y9EA4Jb4qwRaqQJaTIvu-xBi8/
2682285
1822391
[quicwg/base-drafts] ea8baa: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md[quicwg/base-drafts] ea8baa: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/EqmxQ-7P8_rvYo4akKqW5jn0nIk/
2682284
1823152
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9vQBhRjVRpqAwE9HPkmLz3jPGPA/
2682283
1822391
[quicwg/base-drafts] 4edcbc: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md[quicwg/base-drafts] 4edcbc: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
janaiyengar
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/c4cFhEax8hDWmkX_TKqnQ0JU41M/
2682282
1823151
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rnRklrCEDtm71020ZDz_fIdknLs/
2682278
1822391
[quicwg/base-drafts] 820e03: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md[quicwg/base-drafts] 820e03: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
janaiyengar
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0D2o6F7YujzaI7Ab9uO1NhaAqPo/
2682277
1823150
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ignore packet loss when the keys are not available (#2327)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7XFamuDAlFRRQdjKMzD34avpVRM/
2682276
1822391
[quicwg/base-drafts] 9471af: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md[quicwg/base-drafts] 9471af: Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
janaiyengar
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/e2rDWmdJquVPvkgOX8j2x7DbBuA/
2682275
1823149
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ixAjIL4dKe9xz-eGWDaReDO4DRo/
2682268
1819264
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK: instructions and stream description is suboptimal (#2339)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK: instructions and stream description is suboptimal (#2339)
Lucas Pardue
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/CG9aC10Heb-0-T_sSfvO74Hcat0/
2682267
1823145
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK: instructions and stream description is suboptimal (#2339)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK: instructions and stream description is suboptimal (#2339)
afrind
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/dsYb4pPutSkaUy70orPJv9Efu2A/
2682263
1823145
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] extended unidirectional streams can be closed or reset (#2332)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] extended unidirectional streams can be closed or reset (#2332)
Mike Bishop
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6CORlFPpzXWNJ5pVjJV-nr8Q8O4/
2682262
1822738
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What should the receiver do when the peer closes a unidirectional stream before providing the stream type? (#2331)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What should the receiver do when the peer closes a unidirectional stream before providing the stream type? (#2331)
Mike Bishop
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/uxJYqm6Gc2DtavfZmbmTIITh15Y/
2682261
1822695
[quicwg/base-drafts] 0fcb05: extended unidirectional streams can be closed or r...[quicwg/base-drafts] 0fcb05: extended unidirectional streams can be closed or r...
Kazuho Oku
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/a2W-4kv1JsrQ2Nb7VuqDD3-yNS8/
2682260
1823146
[quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK: instructions and stream description is suboptimal (#2339)[quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK: instructions and stream description is suboptimal (#2339)
Lucas Pardue
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6iNzoPDCv-JSMOr_N5xqvi7gTGI/
2682257
1823145
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)
MikkelFJ
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ojGXu3xL_pGd654D92FPnNU09vY/
2682252
1819264
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)
MikkelFJ
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zDnlWhY5ECmg11OPH9WeYTZt6Qo/
2682251
1819264
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets can lead to an unrecoverable situation (#2267)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets can lead to an unrecoverable situation (#2267)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jXN2N3pM3fyaKytIxUK_v-WExek/
2682248
1821170
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] How many datagrams can a client send prior to validating the path? (#2135)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tUVJ_42QtU8HouEqt7DdOB6kRoI/
2682247
1819264
[quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3: Push stream description diagram is ambiguous (#2338)[quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3: Push stream description diagram is ambiguous (#2338)
Lucas Pardue
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Yk9N_kwtd7g7RlzhAjuc9AW4wYY/
2682246
1823144
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] consider making the varint encoding unique (#2299)
ianswett
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/mdJb3TzZTH-gkCjHeohtvQw-0Fc/
2682244
1821882
[quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3: is the recommended size of max bidi streams normative? (#2337)[quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3: is the recommended size of max bidi streams normative? (#2337)
Lucas Pardue
2019-01-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wM9uT6kMwyyllnXk3gFJabYmEno/
2682211
1823122