IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss Application-Limited Sending (#1637)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Wed, 16 January 2019 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BB1130E84 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 09:26:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 229b5cjQHGW3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 09:26:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o11.sgmail.github.com (o11.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF1CC130E67 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 09:26:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=U4KLaw+ynferMAh8C0iYLgX3PGI=; b=gKQ37b767//Hk/+g iXdVji6YvM0WxI3Dk88fQxcxG4OvrGaFywXluNekHAcSdO1hssH56oMOErozFVCG wOkqwyd8qIs25lPQ3fMrXOhD4IPaAawSgm2498TzUYvr6Ji3T9cMGgnFnQES/RWZ oHic7fDPj+p+dX/HSHEEYNnUWu0=
Received: by filter0251p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0251p1iad2-6967-5C3F693B-A 2019-01-16 17:26:19.15775305 +0000 UTC m=+153719.379758590
Received: from github-lowworker-f6df7df.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.41]) by ismtpd0012p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id oo6U6WhaQzqHeksHll3nTA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:26:19.094 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-f6df7df.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154C03E0329 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 09:26:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:26:19 +0000
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abeecc4107239c029b264a4d3c6a44cc13f4951c4692cf0000000118572b3b92a169ce14c4e0aa@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1637/review/193258313@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1637@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1637@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss Application-Limited Sending (#1637)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c3f693b140a2_2943f80a22d45bc127090"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak3BbNQszBVI++vBVUrCf98IGzQmPySk2L+Ib8 PnQ0EurAE3y1w8USXX3X8Y5ZU73G1+87qOOhKdct+wWcF3ZwPmQjbs4XNB2Nuy408tDy79xmMrnKIE dTn9NHrZ86lYxx/0sqAyxMU1bXwYLY97wXqMh+Z1LLQRzX/mEDYDfj4zVg==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ZtbxoSVCLvnDdm8aWLFYmP6SrYE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:26:29 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.



> @@ -999,6 +996,18 @@ paces the sending of any packets in excess of the initial congestion window.
 A sender MAY implement alternate mechanisms to update its congestion window
 after idle periods, such as those proposed for TCP in {{?RFC7661}}.
 
+## Application Limited Sending
+
+The congestion window should not be increased in slow start or congestion
+avoidance when it is not fully utilized.  The congestion window could be
+under-utilized due to insufficient application data to send or flow control
+limits.
+
+When the sender is pacing(see {{pacing}}) packets, the sender may be unable
+to use the full congestion window for a period of time after receiving an
+ACK, due to pacing.  In this case, the sender should not consider themselves

True, changed to acknowledgements.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1637#discussion_r248377271

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email