Subject
From
Date
List
[v6ops] IETF109:: IPv6-only adoption challenges and standardization requirements[v6ops] IETF109:: IPv6-only adoption challenges and standardization requirements
Ron Bonica
2020-11-30
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ChoMyOpjpyStnUHWhsPeA9Wygow/
2969616
1927799
Re: [v6ops] IETF109:: IPv6-only adoption challenges and standardization requirementsRe: [v6ops] IETF109:: IPv6-only adoption challenges and standardization requirements
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-30
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Cp9ElpIPRXTmOGgi168SoeM11iA/
2969653
1927799
Re: [v6ops] IETF109:: IPv6-only adoption challenges and standardization requirementsRe: [v6ops] IETF109:: IPv6-only adoption challenges and standardization requirements
Fernando Gont
2020-11-30
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/3ut_SLJhGt5HgxjchbxkhwF2hXk/
2969697
1927799
Re: [v6ops] IETF109:: IPv6-only adoption challenges and standardization requirementsRe: [v6ops] IETF109:: IPv6-only adoption challenges and standardization requirements
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-12-07
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Iv8pzURA9KzI6lEGYaaLhA0H6bw/
2972668
1927799
[v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?[v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ZfgsyDSU6XDp_a8YVQkpT5EXQBI/
2967326
1927049
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Mikael Abrahamsson
2020-11-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/vMw_P7g51sXnBRiSLtw22Cub4Nc/
2967394
1927049
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/dq7PBuIXgpryEMTeFfSHHgyXZsU/
2967521
1927049
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/lF_nooan1gF4WBwcMxgr5k744K4/
2967560
1927049
Re: [v6ops] [EXTERNAL] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] [EXTERNAL] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Manfredi (US), Albert E
2020-11-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/DuR4nAvuHdcYu3rgerELMP5BZII/
2967684
1927049
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Lorenzo Colitti
2020-11-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/7_DmlqBhWOBGzeGQ8PYAXQ63Dc4/
2967730
1927049
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Erik Kline
2020-11-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/zkvo1e88_XvO4WQsCz2_9o83aCs/
2967765
1927049
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Philip Homburg
2020-11-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/jWs-93Lcqesk0BgIofXiLetb31U/
2967801
1927049
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Lorenzo Colitti
2020-11-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/QDB1VQd9PzyQqKPPYgjP9iwuOXA/
2967817
1927049
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
otroan
2020-11-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/qUqRy-f_Qw9lKERg3y8WODVcPPg/
2967803
1927049
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Mikael Abrahamsson
2020-11-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/xbpbODc6aXuLGpkxupdIhDrvc4M/
2967822
1927049
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/xzczlSilhVyWKiI_D7nRLkcBZwk/
2967918
1927049
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/sYQDawMcWlMvqFW5anzMG4Uvl-k/
2967892
1927049
Re: [v6ops] Followup from Ietf 109 v6ops meetingRe: [v6ops] Followup from Ietf 109 v6ops meeting
Fred Baker
2020-11-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/oLPCFdhVoL5f7apixpeKdIY69II/
2966689
1926803
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-11-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/LDm-JY95fyYOXtkGh5C5MUgyTcw/
2967501
1926578
[v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso[v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ELIqTXW7wRUlyvW8Na1Q78qEsRo/
2966103
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-11-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Gmh__H6k_BG4gLtHecZ8gpkP71o/
2967558
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/aNqAPmuAC9x1rAW5MIRIOGXCp68/
2966117
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/1OhHmnJtQKZ2Alc4Y7yQeRmibbk/
2966132
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
otroan
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/3hXcu-4ErdNhtoDXjSeCIJcHg90/
2966137
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/rn7kWnEc_UG2VjMWacE0-nx9D3M/
2966140
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gert Doering
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/AG09lrK41Ki8KUgRGf6jQqUpbLY/
2966150
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ZJID1cCBljwKgxSJay-EYiRFVwI/
2966177
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
otroan
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/mcMHmXxRPo3GADsJIDINmqShx7o/
2966202
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/_njNMQRii3qZp8MRa6QWrprYpsk/
2966346
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Joel M. Halpern
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/VGbC6B4VKFiekV0ZacMuHlMEIbU/
2966349
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Ainp0ddIuvaqsbIT96A67SI75q8/
2966947
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Ole Troan
2020-11-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/iHgEuTzt-q3_ycex2Y2fPZtwKQI/
2966955
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Mjyq16WxIU54-pYM1wSFIKCRT2c/
2966996
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gert Doering
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/AQr0U5liFSlmFec70NDK8NA9KQU/
2967045
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Joel M. Halpern
2020-11-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/AqcjlM1c91smf5x9lZ5uCR1wYV4/
2966964
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/mFch38gkWuzzhpVeyyWLAQ-XIsM/
2967000
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Joel M. Halpern
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ta7-CYAiHwP4Gs0dgkwao9NRrFE/
2967010
1926578
[v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112][v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Brian E Carpenter
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/m2G0yQpoLFsfM95_b9WGUp3N0pw/
2967015
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Mark Smith
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/L-qYdz_htyEY2KD8UdZaSST6vbc/
2967018
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Ca By
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/K_Y7wZ20Plg5cz-L1zi4YBRataE/
2967034
1926578