IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Sat, 21 November 2020 08:50 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241433A0D1E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 00:50:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fNy2Sb4yQcEL for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 00:50:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F4823A0D09 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 00:50:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1605948624; x=1637484624; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=/z9CbRAx+7PJwIW0uPXppRMafGSh6xyaB47OE4POsE0=; b=MiX6olANXutDKEdlZiQyXKiZyb+wDOKQMqkH3xM+TYL944WKqgq2NdKN 87smcUJXbS/PdSIPA9q7fL3xZiMMAhAeJMiznA7KngiONmyAmfrBOLVCF /e5sPOOuRwRfIGHnbiSZJP4g52JHfI1BQb9z0kZfoxNz0zdForEYHvIBh 4wa7Rxrrvc41idtjHiCVnPtRL8aUbzGjgwZiL3aupQD023da+YE60yFFB Qh+y1Ozr45r6h2LYNxx8bP6tI6dgWIG/mgsSG8U6diimPxG+pkmGII2s7 6htutwxhQ3vrZGte6SfnGtIblDHLzB9psuJwMMVFOFzJXlc/hy1UGT9Lu g==;
IronPort-SDR: Kz889PQGxxIyUMmMQk7KegatrPNE9PNRBhEaA17Drd0vm2pbB6KXo7FDgnX5qh2xYNAhjU96dy bIK9/SpQ+gj7Ixkx9vVcmq5+0mh6bZdsfVwiAPdd+pLfzYyIsRaOFSrmtD1YE3LcA6Fsnxs48E 12zR/wPGT5HLZh+TwbDSks5sarH8i9ad1rVRTmZmYyuVDYLIMaDKi8lGUTO7BOowukGeQ7Qy1S nWNqZ7AX8c1D5+b4PhQFmuXzc5FhlQlG1pkkjlY9BSgJVqe5xZt2YPQXARUB5hc04sqp2K2brN eTY=
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Nov 2020 09:50:20 +0100
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97077427F6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 09:50:17 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717B741D19; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 09:50:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 651FBA27B; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 09:50:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 09:50:17 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Cc: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20201121085017.GY13005@Space.Net>
References: <CABNhwV0TbS7Kiynb=jvczJFDyy=uMfd-he+d0ii7aU5AnsUKeA@mail.gmail.com> <7E87C304-802E-4B2F-9DDB-687C91C29E21@employees.org> <CABNhwV3Tve0vW+g8Xy_rpc-vtzCWHoHG9WH-1QDOa9-J88D36g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABNhwV3Tve0vW+g8Xy_rpc-vtzCWHoHG9WH-1QDOa9-J88D36g@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/AQr0U5liFSlmFec70NDK8NA9KQU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 08:50:25 -0000

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 07:36:23PM -0500, Gyan Mishra wrote:
>     3GPP Gateway does not support PD

I challenged that statement before, but that mail was ignored.

It's not there because it is impossible to do, but because vendors 
and operators had no interest in making it happen.

>From RFC 7066:

"Starting from Release-10, DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation was added as an
 optional feature to the 3GPP system architecture"


So - a standard compliant 3GPP Gateway could easily support DHCPv6 PD.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email