Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Mark Smith
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/L-qYdz_htyEY2KD8UdZaSST6vbc/
2967018
1926578
[v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112][v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Brian E Carpenter
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/m2G0yQpoLFsfM95_b9WGUp3N0pw/
2967015
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Joel M. Halpern
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ta7-CYAiHwP4Gs0dgkwao9NRrFE/
2967010
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/mFch38gkWuzzhpVeyyWLAQ-XIsM/
2967000
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Mjyq16WxIU54-pYM1wSFIKCRT2c/
2966996
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Joel M. Halpern
2020-11-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/AqcjlM1c91smf5x9lZ5uCR1wYV4/
2966964
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Ole Troan
2020-11-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/iHgEuTzt-q3_ycex2Y2fPZtwKQI/
2966955
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Ainp0ddIuvaqsbIT96A67SI75q8/
2966947
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Flow Label Load BalancingRe: [v6ops] Flow Label Load Balancing
Alexander Azimov
2020-11-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/hzoCTsHDkWSHmGg2TYQlYXSMqcM/
2966690
1926570
Re: [v6ops] Followup from Ietf 109 v6ops meetingRe: [v6ops] Followup from Ietf 109 v6ops meeting
Fred Baker
2020-11-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/oLPCFdhVoL5f7apixpeKdIY69II/
2966689
1926803
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112
Bob Hinden
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/EOAe33FoNqvpLrGdAd9oALNAP4U/
2966374
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112
Brian E Carpenter
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/bVtBWhGaju_LzT-DfYiLDp8PFMQ/
2966362
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Joel M. Halpern
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/VGbC6B4VKFiekV0ZacMuHlMEIbU/
2966349
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/_njNMQRii3qZp8MRa6QWrprYpsk/
2966346
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Flow Label Load BalancingRe: [v6ops] Flow Label Load Balancing
Tom Herbert
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/MMmU5nmty9K38T3MdrPROt32SNY/
2966204
1926570
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
otroan
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/mcMHmXxRPo3GADsJIDINmqShx7o/
2966202
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/jzPhOIUFx5ERUMdUUGbe2TBw4C0/
2966193
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ZJID1cCBljwKgxSJay-EYiRFVwI/
2966177
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/99on3D1ZWo1VY-Rospu4zgKEFH8/
2966174
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/SpK7B69yNajPwA9jjU6c7mkXDpk/
2966160
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gert Doering
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/AG09lrK41Ki8KUgRGf6jQqUpbLY/
2966150
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/e8T9fI9XshCa4yXtZJB2Xc6LsJY/
2966147
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/rn7kWnEc_UG2VjMWacE0-nx9D3M/
2966140
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
otroan
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/3hXcu-4ErdNhtoDXjSeCIJcHg90/
2966137
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/1OhHmnJtQKZ2Alc4Y7yQeRmibbk/
2966132
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/aNqAPmuAC9x1rAW5MIRIOGXCp68/
2966117
1926578
[v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso[v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ELIqTXW7wRUlyvW8Na1Q78qEsRo/
2966103
1926578
[v6ops] Flow Label Load Balancing[v6ops] Flow Label Load Balancing
Alexander Azimov
2020-11-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/V9ZljDjcqKVraHouhwsOWNxHcmU/
2966071
1926570
Re: [v6ops] 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109Re: [v6ops] 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-17
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/2ytA9ZgzRvphI9Od7Xs1n6_ySpw/
2964356
1924810
Re: [v6ops] 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109Re: [v6ops] 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-16
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/rPmXpwVY-OSjzHyNRSkl3z79N_U/
2964316
1924810
[v6ops] Fwd: Requesting NomCom feedback[v6ops] Fwd: Requesting NomCom feedback
Fred Baker
2020-11-11
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/8Cl4a30Bzz7Fw6IKdaASmB8MkaE/
2961752
1925108
[v6ops] Variable SLAAC linux kernel implementation (SLAAC with prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO)[v6ops] Variable SLAAC linux kernel implementation (SLAAC with prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO)
Dmytro Shytyi
2020-11-10
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/J60leLmiN2Z8sRIncDK6BP76CsU/
2961600
1925060
Re: [v6ops] 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109Re: [v6ops] 6MAN Agenda for IETF 109
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-08
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Mh8u3Q0EkegYHurnz9s_d6ugx7w/
2960684
1924810
Re: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txtRe: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txt
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/dDJ9HWoHHM3frxkD0A9NztT1bi8/
2960065
1923425
Re: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txtRe: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txt
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/sWVm4Zg0xTmV8kg40utC2VYOiFE/
2960030
1923425
[v6ops] Adding two drafts to the agenda[v6ops] Adding two drafts to the agenda
Fred Baker
2020-11-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/8gxixHFtRqNKpudjBlN4o_HkaIs/
2959827
1924525
Re: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txtRe: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txt
Bob Hinden
2020-11-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ri3ZanXHVMv6E4gTYjt81bDGCk4/
2959818
1923425
Re: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txtRe: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txt
Mark Smith
2020-11-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/rrPhSqLJN_w_cP8T2lvw8S2gqrQ/
2959816
1923425
Re: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txtRe: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txt
神明達哉
2020-11-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/uyAdWMaDJf_bVlgL8SDg95YuRFs/
2959807
1923425
Re: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txtRe: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txt
Brian E Carpenter
2020-11-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/FGkzCfQzQKvx0EzL4ibHZ_WTJ4Q/
2959798
1923425