IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [104attendees] PRG Departures Experience

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Fri, 29 March 2019 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: 104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B8E1203A1 for <104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 01:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JaeXvI5xMuC6 for <104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 01:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A789120332 for <104attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 01:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-836a.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-836a.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.131.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x2T8U3S7010417 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Mar 2019 03:30:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1553848208; bh=GZbRpOv4JSIYFo0e+KdVkHMO+QyRTZbXHZ7b9LeBCJ4=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=UbDR+QdgNEydpENWqoCGBx36/KV3UIw+KjZF+JbDxqN4E8kBaA6vg1hRki7c78sfX ygwM5wkBRGrQo14zbM247tWV8T+/rx8L7+omIQEBteAJX/DuIO6QdrZVGDnSxKC/Wm zpLVxx6ynB4iF2oXqtIgE0GiQGJ+CvrGmNu/HdSo=
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <F169945F-309D-4101-8565-07D930961201@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0F28DB09-91CA-4F5F-AD98-4DAFBCA5796B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 09:30:01 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAMeF8nA3OqQwki8wO+Z9UH1pevTr3dcTB7fe2nwe4t_fVtD-8A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Krsek <michal@krsek.cz>, 104 attendees <104attendees@ietf.org>, "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
To: Chris Morrow <morrowc=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <74DD99D6-6DBF-4900-8766-FB0E8FB400E9@cable.comcast.com> <7AF98565-AA2F-4623-B335-25C40357296A@krsek.cz> <CAMeF8nA3OqQwki8wO+Z9UH1pevTr3dcTB7fe2nwe4t_fVtD-8A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/104attendees/6pPU4MBocuZ41WA-gx8eEcgrw1s>
Subject: Re: [104attendees] PRG Departures Experience
X-BeenThere: 104attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 104 attendees for official communication <104attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/104attendees>, <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/104attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:104attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/104attendees>, <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 08:30:22 -0000

Are the security line comments for Schengen zone flights?

BA tells me my flight to LHR will have gate security (which was the case on previous flights.) That can still take time, but at least you only have to compete with the number of people that can fill a single A 319 or A320.

Ben.


> On Mar 29, 2019, at 9:21 AM, Chris Morrow <morrowc=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> As I checked in about twenty minutes ago... There were folk in line for over 45 minutes they said. (Lufthansa)
> 
> Security too a bit of time as well... Many folk misunderstanding security requirements ;(
> 
> All though in about 30 total minutes to the other side of security.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019, 07:15 Michal Krsek <michal@krsek.cz> wrote:
> Please do not underestimate queues that can be very long and happen from time to time. 30 minutes is very good time and can’t be used as “normal in a rush hour”.
> 
> M
> 
> On 29 Mar 2019, at 01:52, Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> wrote:
> 
>> Just sharing my experience today.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> To PRG: It took only 30 minutes by car during the morning rush hour, such as it is.
>> 
>> Terminal: I saw only very short lines for ticketing and baggage check areas. The line for security took 10 minutes or less to clear (terminal for travel within the EU), and there were several lines open.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> It was an overall very fast experience.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Jason
>> 
>> --
>> 104attendees mailing list
>> 104attendees@ietf..org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/104attendees
> --
> 104attendees mailing list
> 104attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/104attendees
> --
> 104attendees mailing list
> 104attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/104attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email