IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [105attendees] Plenary & RSE - Maximize Value of Discussion

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Wed, 24 July 2019 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: 105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F080120043; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:21:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jxyM5qFz4pYE; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88CCB120024; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=31.133.150.194;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'Brian E Carpenter' <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "'Livingood, Jason'" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>, 105attendees@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, 'IAB' <iab@iab.org>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <9A3A4383-3D05-489D-8A07-191E02438B8B@cable.comcast.com> <34d1963a-5445-5b72-efe7-fd7d0c1ea1d7@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <34d1963a-5445-5b72-efe7-fd7d0c1ea1d7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:21:44 -0400
Message-ID: <011b01d5423b$e2e4b240$a8ae16c0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIdXddWEccAmRCKgDKi8LOnkdWw4wHOdnrSpjtHxPA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190724-6, 07/24/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/105attendees/ShOa3shYDKIUzndAC8LqP8oQQZ4>
Subject: Re: [105attendees] Plenary & RSE - Maximize Value of Discussion
X-BeenThere: 105attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 105 attendees for official communication <105attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/105attendees>, <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/105attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:105attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/105attendees>, <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:21:52 -0000

Brian:  

I still do not fully understand the "what" and "why".   It seems important to me to hear those things directly. 

Sue 

-----Original Message-----
From: 105attendees [mailto:105attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2019 10:27 AM
To: Livingood, Jason; 105attendees@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; IAB; The IESG
Subject: Re: [105attendees] Plenary & RSE - Maximize Value of Discussion

On 25-Jul-19 02:03, Livingood, Jason wrote:
> (LLC hat off – personal opinion)
> Many opinions and views have already been expressed on the mailing list in the past several weeks. In my personal view, the 'what' and 'why' has been explored and discussed extensively. I don't think rehashing that will bring much value to the community, momentarily satisfying though it may seem. 

I wish, I really wish, I could agree with you. But there are still unanswered questions.

> Rather, in order to maximize the precious value of the mic time at the plenary, I think it would be most interesting for people to express their views on what should happen next - both in the near-term and long-term. It seems some rather fundamental questions about how to proceed in the future have been raised and this is where community views would be highly valuable.

That's true too. But one way to avoid future mistakes is to fully understand past mistakes. Are we at that point yet, as a community?

   Brian
 

-- 
105attendees mailing list
105attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/105attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email