IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [5gangip] New Version Notification for draft-xyzy-atick-gaps-00.txt

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Fri, 08 June 2018 08:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: 5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95B9130E3D for <5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 01:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4QGNF94z-UHx for <5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 01:57:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C92FF130E35 for <5gangip@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 01:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id v16-v6so1968183wmh.5 for <5gangip@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 01:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZG2jbHLZE3LkOzWFygRmTrBqNAsWdcTWZbCP6xTJ6So=; b=rvK879SykFON1hOvsLojNXH+HhJYxojrlKtAiiD9IheVIAmOGgeb3Fxobo/Af2DyPG d+QBUvpZ2pWaaELpbe7ilvHx8mUVfyxoWJ9EMYiXAAqWnqHgsXfHj9dDeI8g4yImtp69 QemrBXsWhmD258wjdk80+Jr0KOam1VemXpZw7bkTMp3/a4jBcYBgx6y1D4TqVkrI/hIa JrPbUy/6VazKihzVbFvcV7jbM/GeHLcCv3dnopGjrHKtOAf6rqML3ZzXijODn7tjlVvt q1TNI00+A/CYXsocl7RbZRPG0caDVPN1RD+tRj/frvhiyKPu9/OeRs65u66z5GtuAoDN vEQA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZG2jbHLZE3LkOzWFygRmTrBqNAsWdcTWZbCP6xTJ6So=; b=MXPOdvUn/8NlWu9DGvWlY5DxuoWnpr8KbUXw1iwWYvIOql5aujI7ISM/MJN+61ou18 85GGTD2+vVhvaVuDjjkdUpPRrxv6ikrlgHNtPiNA0FDYVVrB6qut+TLfa17z3gymoyK3 2PB3CL5DMPKjCjWI0clHRIATJKaELn6ZJOq/PB2VxbSDVwSN/wP6Whv2aWpoCQUU7fjC 4uSCr1X/bv80gaBz+97rZraCpaXKgfVItVGIRW2FpDvPhqwURuC5rZgkObSslwBlBmDb ThPudO3RF8X53VjqYj2fLkJuP4IULG9ZTrKKxZy0Mxuew/zT9TGJsYeiwzbCPEdZz7wr A6yg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3Qx3G8sv9K2V3Fv6gtq3D9rjywIxf4Wh2fxiTCkBa5CaLnqpwK zf/GalPdV5oPECagtd/NV57cVg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLMdjwmrklrURfolE3WsRgCWNkVZM7edd6fvs7TkHrA6LdmvXYKjW0crpK1ANzRizK0lFXNDg==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:58a:: with SMTP id 132-v6mr856504wmf.95.1528448233304; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 01:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 2a01cb040489200039e3b98f6961bc35.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr (2a01cb040489200039e3b98f6961bc35.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2a01:cb04:489:2000:39e3:b98f:6961:bc35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r11-v6sm17973767wrn.34.2018.06.08.01.57.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Jun 2018 01:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <18C4E8AC-6CA0-4247-AB9D-27B8F1237FDD@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 10:57:09 +0200
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@quantonium.net>, "FIGURELLE, TERRY F" <tf2934@att.com>, Rex Buddenberg <buddenbergr@gmail.com>, 5GANGIP <5gangip@ietf.org>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <43D432FC-8260-4E4C-BE0E-7B1BFB299348@gigix.net>
References: <CAC8QAcfuk6e+JPuKC4sw=FPYSgO3Tkr5mjSRJeOzvjxUSc9xFw@mail.gmail.com> <B300114A-8838-4FE2-8FA9-95BA4CD07089@st-andrews.ac.uk> <C42C02FB-4452-4D4F-A826-F24D401BB76D@gigix.net> <1AFE10CF28AE8B4C9663445736B8034D3826A13C@CAFRFD1MSGUSRJI.ITServices.sbc.com> <F5E27567-7D26-4C10-9327-AF7A6FA3712B@gigix.net> <CALx6S356aAYm5Qp75t+SnB=vRKJYcZiktfZD32n92AjwoW7OWA@mail.gmail.com> <1AFE10CF28AE8B4C9663445736B8034D3826B279@CAFRFD1MSGUSRJI.ITServices.sbc.com> <523BE304-3160-4AB8-BACD-245472382320@gmail.com> <1AFE10CF28AE8B4C9663445736B8034D3826B4D5@CAFRFD1MSGUSRJI.ITServices.sbc.com> <C6C5B0AE-3498-4612-9A24-17BCCD9AC930@gmail.com> <1528414247.2315.235.camel@gmail.com> <1AFE10CF28AE8B4C9663445736B8034D3826B8A3@CAFRFD1MSGUSRJI.ITServices.sbc.com> <94DD51FC-3550-4233-BB8C-CC37161ECF0D@gmail.com> <CAPDqMer17WA+rbzWOXxV-E-0G0h38J=MPMCfDYjvS5-mJZgNFw@mail.gmail.com> <18C4E8AC-6CA0-4247-AB9D-27B8F1237FDD@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/5gangip/CPUEyhCssuiqVnK7MDj16e_FGDU>
Subject: Re: [5gangip] New Version Notification for draft-xyzy-atick-gaps-00.txt
X-BeenThere: 5gangip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of implications of the upcoming 5th Generation \(fixed and\) Mobile communication systems on IP protocols." <5gangip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/5gangip>, <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/5gangip/>
List-Post: <mailto:5gangip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip>, <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 08:57:17 -0000


> On 8 Jun 2018, at 04:57, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Also note the problems of tunneling like encapsulation overhead,
>> diff-serv, hashing for ECMP, UDP checksum, fragmentation go away if
>> tunneling is not being done. This is
> 
> You heard what was said, GTP is not going away anytime soon. 
> 
> There is no diff-serv problem, hashing can always be improved, as was just said in this thread, no UDP checksum problem,  and fragmentation can be avoided. 
> 
> We’ve seen all of this with LISP deployment.

I agree with Dino that people using  LISP have a lot of experience on coping with these kind of issues  

Ciao

L.

> These are not real problems.


> Just ones that are fabricated. 
> 
> Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email