Re: [5gangip] New Version Notification for draft-xyx-5gip-ps-01.txt

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Fri, 26 May 2017 02:50 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F4E129465 for <5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 May 2017 19:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hFDn58ffb1MN for <5gangip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 May 2017 19:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com (mail-io0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3037A1279EB for <5gangip@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 May 2017 19:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x231.google.com with SMTP id p24so2456944ioi.0 for <5gangip@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 May 2017 19:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=P4EcS/g2LmaI1LqHQc96HC/umXuxqPUkbVCxEKcD6rA=; b=I/86+wN1gBHUVoweOGtke3nDNin1IGGMA8AaeNhJdipi4DayOsVSGkc4YgylQ0+nwJ Jd2dLDGWc+/Vbm2AZzDgRQj9hH5SNiZNvdp26HSbWuLKjX77CQ2DUMXiSoi74JgcKYQg pItXK0WkC4vliAunPyBedxEZO3OgL5qTX7zjl6eQqXt1nhaQXLOUADgA2J1qWQcSKeKu RQeD8Cla6zrwogmARe2WnsdWq5UWyk/IGnGrhFrAwh11B6PDzTFmT6DOqtzP6O1yqICZ CHEeeoHydQGtHaRfgtrApTK5Ca+l2DWqjAuR62mdm0RGl2QclJWIF926PxGL7PG8ZkuA qJlw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=P4EcS/g2LmaI1LqHQc96HC/umXuxqPUkbVCxEKcD6rA=; b=KZQU/Ubm/2DyFMG2wMwb1DfhcshSCeSJPB/hlA+RMNsgRb9jK1Z0V4xSEPl52lAsOn /8brzv7peJxZpA8C0ZT4lKy8VeFCXiU8v7fOlkOOsA9DoZWZ6nj39Eyf9MxzjFjRyN3l ErSiLL+IYJyRFq+U6bW01K0uIkTBfF7sTCogzUIHeYqqqvpW8F75W38uCgAl0pGCpymF KdFeSb4kPHa6HTqgkVV/R49k8nId4zS4ZLrq8XrgDRwxBL6ddmlP2BEqn2mXgtnl6Ri2 1sqOoquSAm4Whqq+gg/LkbngLJUe3VTA2DNE63wtCdP7hXDFuHrj+AeacpjzZ/Qz3nRR lY6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcARHLx2qPPQ/Yxa3rDslricDBtpCzupY3GWSX5eLzHvp50sBBAg yZMVpNCWgDBREwlVeks=
X-Received: by 10.107.150.201 with SMTP id y192mr38616852iod.229.1495767016560; Thu, 25 May 2017 19:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (mobile-166-175-191-154.mycingular.net. [166.175.191.154]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m195sm3893911ioe.35.2017.05.25.19.50.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 May 2017 19:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S34D7YeQbgJDbTGxLoPBVqHT6B4FNRq2Jyz_Of+apWgw6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 19:41:41 -0700
Cc: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>, "5gangip@ietf.org" <5gangip@ietf.org>, "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de" <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <20EF7DE1-60CB-4840-8BA5-C7361C557A5B@gmail.com>
References: <149547735610.22634.10661693302211465600.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC8QAcdiCsxRT7_ube47q5YiAdkBP9-jC7AyLWXQaGR4vAboRQ@mail.gmail.com> <1765af8f1375483dba56391633ebb4d5@HE105831.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <CAD6AjGSYJVjnBkA0oTO49=ApPeHQBK=z5JPadBtujoP0_9iL8g@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S35GzM7Kmj9C80VN4TZNZZjYwLWXPpZpbPD0gXS-74Va9g@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGRwK+ikUeytA=H64VMO1o1GkPVV4e9q3CaSi0xNi0xHAw@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S37mF8Ujb75SeG6xOC-X=8KQPBtPj2pNoOvCnFJK6fBtQQ@mail.gmail.com> <9735C639-84B5-4C8F-8C3B-B4E85A16EEB8@st-andrews.ac.uk> <CALx6S36H9f5Ew7b2fru9SOQesJD6YsCt7wwwb1mV=kworXmq5w@mail.gmail.com> <84FDD158-BE3D-400B-A814-53A793437470@st-andrews.ac.uk> <CALx6S35Bxei_3Rh735qKovMNZyi45ho0HTdag=9kpsLtzip71Q@mail.gmail.com> <404F6417-C15D-4E57-9FFD-DB8DA6A055EB@st-andrews.ac.uk> <CALx6S34SKgtVoOGi+SxvFSde81dPm41fmqNrsGLA=MJJXjZHOg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGQQmkzb8Hrdya0rZPn4AhVSe03DDEChnCkzbxv8YtMExg@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S34D7YeQbgJDbTGxLoPBVqHT6B4FNRq2Jyz_Of+apWgw6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/5gangip/uOEzI23WsqWtzby_98PCuT8mFbg>
Subject: Re: [5gangip] New Version Notification for draft-xyx-5gip-ps-01.txt
X-BeenThere: 5gangip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of implications of the upcoming 5th Generation \(fixed and\) Mobile communication systems on IP protocols." <5gangip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/5gangip>, <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/5gangip/>
List-Post: <mailto:5gangip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/5gangip>, <mailto:5gangip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 02:50:18 -0000

>> Hi Tom,
>> 
>> An eNB today is strictly an L2 device today.
>> 
>> Assuming we change that, it may be more fit to say the eNB has a /48 and
>> assigns /64 to a UE per pdp / radio access bearer , that would align more
>> closely with today's architecture, and assuming each UE has exclusive access
>> to the /64, then rfc7238 may be relevant, as it is today.
>> 
> Thanks. So in that case if we let the locator becomes 48 bits which
> means we can have 65K UEs in the network with 80 bit identifier and
> assuming /64 bit assignment. That seems too little UEs for an ID/loc
> split addressing.

This is why an encapsulation data-plane should be considered, even with additional packet overhead, you get flexibility with the 128-bit EID and 128-bit Locator so you don’t have to make the tradeoffs above. 

And you’ll see other benefits at the same time.

Dino