Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00
Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Mon, 13 November 2006 13:42 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gjc4v-0004X3-Mh; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:42:25 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gjc4u-0004VV-Jz for 67attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:42:24 -0500
Received: from [2001:630:d0:f102:230:48ff:fe77:96e] (helo=owl.ecs.soton.ac.uk) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gjc4s-0004pz-Uh for 67attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:42:24 -0500
Received: from goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk (goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.131]) by owl.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kADDg1Fn027702 for <67attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:42:01 GMT
Received: from login.ecs.soton.ac.uk (login.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.162]) by goose.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kADDfpb5008907 for <67attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:41:51 GMT
Received: (from tjc@localhost) by login.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) id kADDfmZ7006061 for 67attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:41:48 GMT
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:41:48 +0000
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: 67attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00
Message-ID: <20061113134147.GF5131@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <EE8D912486CB3B40978DC42135F2BF8C88A733@ma02exchtmp01.Cantata.com> <BADDD6BD-EB92-4893-8C62-718AF5A49CAC@multicasttech.com> <A0927308-C51A-4C31-A395-BEDBDF3CFB86@mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A0927308-C51A-4C31-A395-BEDBDF3CFB86@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Null-Tag: 67d49a1d3ddeaf57dedb7996ef60389a
X-Null-Tag: e819b892b264a43edf301082ce833e7c
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-Spam-Status: No
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
X-BeenThere: 67attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 67 Attendess <67attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees>, <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/67attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:67attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees>, <mailto:67attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 67attendees-bounces@ietf.org
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 08:04:10AM -0500, Ken Raeburn wrote: > On Nov 11, 2006, at 00:30, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > >I would like to second that. Even during plenary, I had no troubles. > > I hate to say it, but on the 802.11b/g network, I did have some > problems during the plenary sessions -- fell off the network once or > twice. But when I switched off the built-in 802.11b/g card in my > laptop and plugged in an 802.11a card, everything was fine.... Aside > from the plenary, though, I had no problems at all, even while I was > lounging out by the pool. Very nice. I suspect this is one of the reasons why thinghs are getting better. By using 11a we get better quality for the 11a users and reduce contention for the 11b/g people (though I suspect most g's fall back to b?). Any charts of volumes of use? :) I loved the analysis paper done for the network a couple of years ago; any more documentation/discussion like that is very welcome. -- Tim _______________________________________________ 67ATTENDEES mailing list 67ATTENDEES@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/67attendees
- [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12:00 Jim Martin
- [67ATTENDEES] Re: IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Tim Chown
- [67ATTENDEES] Re: IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Burger, Eric
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] Re: IETF 67 Network goes down a… Joerg Ott
- RE: [67ATTENDEES] Re: IETF 67 Network goes down a… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] Re: IETF 67 Network goes down a… Krzysztof Rzecki
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Ken Raeburn
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Tim Chown
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Bill Fenner
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Tim Chown
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Richard Barnes
- Re(2): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at… Peter Lovell
- Re: Re(2): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Jim Martin
- Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at… Peter Lovell
- Re: Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Tim Chown
- Re: Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Fred Baker
- Re: Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Markus Stenberg
- RE: Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Tom Alexander
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
- Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at… Tim Thome
- Re: Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Simon Leinen
- Re: Re(4): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Re(2): [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes dow… Stephen Casner
- Re: [67ATTENDEES] IETF 67 Network goes down at 12… Tim Chown