[6tisch] CoAP resource management - draft-ietf-6tisch-coap-02
"Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak)" <rsudhaak@cisco.com> Tue, 11 November 2014 15:37 UTC
Return-Path: <rsudhaak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1041A8A5A for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:37:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_48=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S2w2qehWy0aQ for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:36:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB3571A8AAF for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:36:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=26687; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415720216; x=1416929816; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=AOElM9X4nbTmONCP66BVkyZ2JyGGdeV1VJivSNfagTI=; b=Do6odCz6ZAty7bMy2pWKYSYYPwNvO9z3WicEQaTYel858pnxOExmmY8b 9Xw2jN/pk6VIR3u+Idt3cZaOJu705ydaWJlnEfH67SCuBHS2kDpXmxVGI X/WIBD/OWnHokUjzxLnZx2Md4avzOctu5j9cntciME2c672ziTpzojIlV s=;
X-Files: Changetouri.txt, versioning.txt : 11489, 4280
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkFAAgsYlStJV2Q/2dsb2JhbABSCoJIRlRdzCGHT4EZFgEBAQEBfYQJJ2QBDEQwJwQhiDMNqEWlYwEBAQEBAQQBAQEBAQEBARYEjViCUBBBF4RWBYY6i3eCGIFSaYJHhFqBNIcBhniHM4N6gXs5gQMBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,362,1413244800"; d="txt'?scan'208,217";a="371193373"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2014 15:36:52 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sABFaq0u000885 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:36:52 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.91]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:36:52 -0600
From: "Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak)" <rsudhaak@cisco.com>
To: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: CoAP resource management - draft-ietf-6tisch-coap-02
Thread-Index: AQHP/cVQc+aUxQBFuUqRL08yJHRHSQ==
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:36:51 +0000
Message-ID: <D0876D12.C03C%rsudhaak@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.4.140807
x-originating-ip: [10.21.86.174]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_005_D0876D12C03Crsudhaakciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/KP78NaV0V8EANQKMYxlDwDPbc0A
Subject: [6tisch] CoAP resource management - draft-ietf-6tisch-coap-02
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:37:00 -0000
All, The chairs and the authors discussed the CoAP draft recently. We agreed that we need to push the CoAP draft since CoMAN may take a long time to converge and become usable. We also agreed that some changes were required to the CoAP draft to make any future transition to CoMAN easy. The changes discussed are as follows - 1. Add versioning info – This will allow heterogenous 6top nodes to communicate in the same network and PCE (or peer nodes) to take advantages of resources available in future versions. Also allows easier transition to CoMAN. * Added text to RFC. attached changes in versioning.txt (this is a git diff for easy review) 2. Shorten resource names – to reduce overhead * Added text to RFC. Attached changes in changetouri.txt The third and most important discussion was - 3. How do nodes exchange the version data (with PCE and other nodes) of nodes so a network of heterogenous nodes (w.r.t version) can interoperate. 1. Proposal - use the joining flows defined in draft-richardson-6tisch--security-6top-03 Comments and suggestions on this proposal are requested. The updated draft is available on bitbucket - https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/draft-ietf-6tisch-coap/overview -raghuram
- [6tisch] CoAP resource management - draft-ietf-6t… Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak)
- Re: [6tisch] CoAP resource management - draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] CoAP resource management - draft-iet… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [6tisch] CoAP resource management - draft-iet… Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak)
- Re: [6tisch] CoAP resource management - draft-iet… Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] CoAP resource management - draft-iet… Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] CoAP resource management - draft-iet… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Xavier Vilajosana
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Michael Richardson
- [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Tero Kivinen
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- [6tisch] on the fallacy of default keys (was: Re:… Rene Struik
- Re: [6tisch] on the fallacy of default keys (was:… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] on the fallacy of default keys Rene Struik
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Pat Kinney
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Tero Kivinen
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Tero Kivinen
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Kris Pister
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Tero Kivinen
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Tero Kivinen
- [6tisch] emails on 802.15.4 specs Rene Struik
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top yoshihiro.ohba
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Carsten Bormann
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Tero Kivinen
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Tero Kivinen
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top yoshihiro.ohba
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top dejichen
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top Thomas Watteyne