IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [78attendees] Lessons we can take from the Internet connectivity fiasco in Maastricht...

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Thu, 29 July 2010 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <iljitsch@muada.com>
X-Original-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 78attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F3828C187 for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vv9-4F8LQH4x for <78attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:2:5::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1AE928C163 for <78attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8::144:223:12ff:fe56:36b2] ([IPv6:2001:df8:0:144:223:12ff:fe56:36b2]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id o6TBi6PJ084487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:44:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <F8B62618-A1D4-4DCA-BC42-4F1F96CBB7A4@nominum.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:44:43 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F6D93954-3B19-4A00-B6C4-179EAD8C3767@muada.com>
References: <2172BD75-3FDD-4F4A-863F-59BA29B57048@nominum.com> <BC771E58-E394-4C0A-A27F-DCC8FC5A7AE1@muada.com> <F8B62618-A1D4-4DCA-BC42-4F1F96CBB7A4@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: "78attendees@ietf.org" <78attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [78attendees] Lessons we can take from the Internet connectivity fiasco in Maastricht...
X-BeenThere: 78attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 78 attendees list <78attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/78attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:78attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/78attendees>, <mailto:78attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:44:23 -0000

On 29 jul 2010, at 8:51, Ted Lemon wrote:

>> There is a very good network at the venue. Nobody has to be without connectivity many non-sleeping, non-eating hours.

> I think you concentrate better than I do.   It's generally difficult to find a place in the venue where you can sit and work in silence.

Hm, actually I was thinking earlier about what the talking etiquette should be in the terminal room. We currently also have the room where we eat lunch which has a decent number of power outlets so it seems that a library-like policy on talking in the terminal room wouldn't be unreasonable.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email