Re: [95attendees] hhonors points credited ?

"Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Sun, 24 April 2016 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: 95attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 95attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC0C12D140; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 12:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xklsS4bdGobn; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 12:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E3012D129; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 12:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.111] (modemcable093.65-160-184.mc.videotron.ca [184.160.65.93]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7AC547579; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:46:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:46:33 -0400
Message-ID: <F3747820-405E-45E4-926D-33A4E7C028A0@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <0C4C579D-3001-4CD1-870E-88AF01471D75@consulintel.es>
References: <20160423181355.34653.qmail@ary.lan> <999ABC36-0722-4F4F-9275-65E0D9DA880F@ogre.com> <F852BC1B-EE3C-4889-87D9-C8C75AF38DAB@puck.nether.net> <CACtwGy0YZbnGb2_3dvwfkrh8to+U1Po7sSr+g-=ZFESdGY6SsQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1604232346350.90585@ary.lan> <6EB74F4C-BB0B-476F-A7F0-90165D2D32D8@ieee.org> <EBF4C3D2-D5E5-4E68-81BC-6D9A7A052559@alcatel-lucent.com> <0C4C579D-3001-4CD1-870E-88AF01471D75@consulintel.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_5EB0E87D-9ABA-4CD0-97FC-8D2C770F6F2D_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/95attendees/BN_PMKYLe7hG54LcAlhvubEKPvc>
Cc: "95attendees@ietf.org" <95attendees@ietf.org>, ietf-secretariat@ietf.org, iaoc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [95attendees] hhonors points credited ?
X-BeenThere: 95attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 95 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <95attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/95attendees>, <mailto:95attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/95attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:95attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:95attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/95attendees>, <mailto:95attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 19:46:37 -0000

On 24 Apr 2016, at 5:40, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:

> I’m copying the IAOC and Secretariat, in case they aren’t reading 
> this thread.
>
> I went to the Hilton member web site to reclaim the points.
>
> They just told me the same, it was a special rate, and as you said, 
> nobody informed us.
>
> I understood from a recent thread, that the secretariat will inform us 
> in every meeting, if the hotel is respecting or not the chain points. 
> Or did I got it wrong ?
>
> In my personal case, I’m paying, since several years ago, from my 
> own personal pocket traveling expenses, including hotel, and IETF 
> registration, and this means that participating IETF avoids me to use 
> my money/miles/points for other activities, such vacations, other 
> investments, etc.

me too.

>
> I understand that those that have a company backup have other 
> perspective, however it is obvious that those contributing from 
> personal pocket have *at least*, the right to get the correct 
> information sufficiently ahead to be able to decide and book the most 
> convenient hotel.
>
> My interest is to book an hotel that balance between price, membership 
> level and points, and even the chance to pay with points instead of 
> money.

my own two cents: points are the least of my concerns and I hope, 
contrary to your opinion, that secretariat/iaoc
  will _not_ take points into accounts while negotiating the best price 
for the whole meeting.

Marc.

>
> So at every IETF, I look for all the alternatives, and in this case, 
> as I usually do, I got first a reservation with points, many months in 
> advance the meeting. Then when the meeting rate was published, as 
> nobody said that they will not respect the stay for membership level, 
> neither points, I cancel the reservation with points and booked with 
> the IETF rate, as it was a good one, and I expected to keep my Hilton 
> level with this stay and the next one in Seoul.
>
> Now, I spent a big amount of money and this is not counting for 
> keeping my level, neither getting the point, and this has been done 
> because lack of information from the IAOC/Secretariat.
>
> I think there is a lack of transparency/information here that avoid 
> the participants to take reasonable decisions. Who is going to pay for 
> that ?
>
> Os is the hotel acting against the agreement with the IETF ?
>
> We really need to know about this from Secretariat/IAOC.
>
> And please, let us know URGENTLY, if the next meetings Berlin and 
> Seoul, the hotels will respect or not our membership points and level. 
> Knowing it NOW still can help to book for alternatives. If we want to 
> book with points, we need to do much ahead that the IETF hotel and 
> registration is made official.
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: 95attendees <95attendees-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de "Dolganow, 
> Andrew (Nokia - SG)" <andrew.dolganow@nokia.com>
> Responder a: <andrew.dolganow@nokia.com>
> Fecha: domingo, 24 de abril de 2016, 11:17
> Para: "95attendees@ietf.org" <95attendees@ietf.org>
> CC: EXT Ali Karimi <ali.karimi@ieee.org>, "John R. Levine" 
> <ietf@johnlevine.com>
> Asunto: Re: [95attendees] hhonors points credited ?
>
>> I have spoken with the hotel. I was told we got a group booking (not 
>> individual rate but group booking - this is though not how we 
>> booked). Group bookings  are not eligible. Calling hotel is waste of 
>> time in my opinion.
>>
>> I am now going though Hilton  members support and it is still in 
>> progress - I am a Diamond member and am now complaining beyond 
>> regular support desk as they will not do much due to how hotel 
>> entered the stay.
>>
>> It would be good if anyone from IETF actually told us whether they 
>> actually agreed to a group/no point rate.  There was nothing on the 
>> web indicating that while booking and i cannot think of a meeting in 
>> IETF in that would exclude loyalty program.
>>
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Apr 24, 2016, at 2:12 PM, EXT Ali Karimi <ali.karimi@ieee.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, some of these hotels are franchise, your honors points are from 
>>> corporate
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Apr 23, 2016, at 8:47 PM, John R. Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Send your receipt to honor rewards department, and let them get it 
>>>>> for you,
>>>>> Hilton reward department will honor it, do not bother with hotel.
>>>>
>>>> Have you done this?  Did it work?
>>>>
>>>>> Promote Green Technologies
>>>>>
>>>>> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>>>>>
>>>>> Technology has the potential to transform the way we address some 
>>>>> of the
>>>>> world’s toughest challenges. The rapid growth of new and 
>>>>> lower-cost
>>>>> technologies creates a fertile opportunity for technological 
>>>>> innovation in
>>>>> the service of humanity.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This e-mail message and its contents are legally privileged and
>>>>> confidential information that is intended solely for the use of 
>>>>> the
>>>>> addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
>>>>> recipient, you
>>>>> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying 
>>>>> or other
>>>>> use of this message and its contents is strictly prohibited.  If 
>>>>> you have
>>>>> received this e-mail message in error, please notify us 
>>>>> immediately by
>>>>> reply e-mail at ali.karimi@ieee.org and delete the message.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This Office does not accept or consent to the service of process, 
>>>>> motions,
>>>>> pleadings, documents or any other items by electronic format.
>>>>> Correspondences via electronic format does not indicate an 
>>>>> agreement or
>>>>> consent to acceptance of service in such format.
>>>>
>>>> Uh, wow.
>>>>
>>>> R's,
>>>> John
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 95attendees mailing list
>>> 95attendees@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/95attendees
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 95attendees mailing list
>> 95attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/95attendees
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 95attendees mailing list
> 95attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/95attendees